COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF LOVASTATIN AND NIACIN IN PRIMARY HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA - A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL

被引:95
作者
ILLINGWOUTH, DR
STEIN, EA
MITCHEL, YB
DUJOVNE, CA
FROST, PH
KNOPP, RH
TUN, P
ZUPKIS, RV
GREGUSKI, RA
机构
[1] MED RES LABS, CINCINNATI, OH USA
[2] MERCK SHARP & DOHME LTD, RES LABS, RAHWAY, NJ USA
[3] UNIV KANSAS, MED CTR, DEPT MED, KANSAS CITY, KS 66103 USA
[4] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO, DEPT MED, SAN FRANCISCO, CA USA
[5] UNIV WASHINGTON, SCH MED, DEPT MED, SEATTLE, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.154.14.1586
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Niacin and lovastatin are both effective drugs for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and are among the drugs of first choice recommended by the adult treatment panel. To date, however, no studies have directly compared the lipoprotein-modifying effects and safety of lovastatin and niacin across their usual dosage range in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. Methods: The efficacy and safety of lovastatin and niacin were compared in a controlled, randomized, open-label study of 26 weeks' duration that was conducted at five lipid clinics. One hundred thirty-six patients with primary hypercholesterolemia participated in the study. Entry criteria were a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level greater than 4.37 mmol/L (160 mg/dL) with coronary heart disease and/or more than two coronary heart disease risk factors or an LDL cholesterol level greater than 5.19 mmol/L (190 mg/dL) in patients without coronary heart disease or less than two coronary heart disease risk factors. The study consisted of a 4-week diet run-in period after which eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment with either lovastatin (20 mg/d) or niacin (1.5 g/d) for 10 weeks. On the basis of the LDL cholesterol response and patient tolerance, the doses were sequentially increased to 40 and 80 mg/d of lovastatin or 3 and 4.5 g/d of niacin after 10 and 18 weeks of treatment, respectively. Results: In the two patient groups, 66% of patients treated with lovastatin and 54% of patients treated with niacin underwent full dosage titration. At all time points, lovastatin was significantly (P<.01) more effective than niacin in reducing LDL cholesterol levels (26% vs 5% at week 10, 28% vs 16% at week 18, and 32% vs 23% at week 26), whereas niacin was more effective (P<.01) in increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (6% vs 20% at week 10, 8% vs 29% at week 18, and 7% vs 33% at week 26). Niacin reduced Lp(a) lipoprotein levels by 35% at week 26, whereas lovastatin had no effect. Cutaneous flushing was the most common side effect during treatment with niacin. Conclusions: Lovastatin and niacin both exerted favorable dose-dependent changes on the concentrations of plasma lipids and lipoproteins. Lovastatin was more effective in reducing LDL cholesterol concentrations, whereas niacin was more effective in increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations and reducing the Lp(a) lipoprotein level. Lovastatin was better tolerated than niacin, in large part because of the common cutaneous side effects of niacin.
引用
收藏
页码:1586 / 1595
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] EFFECT OF A MODIFIED, WELL-TOLERATED NIACIN REGIMEN ON SERUM TOTAL CHOLESTEROL, HIGH-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL AND THE CHOLESTEROL TO HIGH-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN RATIO
    ALDERMAN, JD
    PASTERNAK, RC
    SACKS, FM
    SMITH, HS
    MONRAD, ES
    GROSSMAN, W
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1989, 64 (12) : 725 - 729
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1975, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V231, P360
  • [3] CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHIC CHANGES WITH LOVASTATIN THERAPY - THE MONITORED ATHEROSCLEROSIS REGRESSION STUDY (MARS)
    BLANKENHORN, DH
    AZEN, SP
    KRAMSCH, DM
    MACK, WJ
    CASHINHEMPHILL, L
    HODIS, HN
    DEBOER, LWV
    MAHRER, PR
    MASTELLER, MJ
    VAILAS, LI
    ALAUPOVIC, P
    HIRSCH, LJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 119 (10) : 969 - 976
  • [4] BENEFICIAL-EFFECTS OF COMBINED COLESTIPOL-NIACIN THERAPY ON CORONARY ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND CORONARY VENOUS BYPASS GRAFTS
    BLANKENHORN, DH
    NESSIM, SA
    JOHNSON, RL
    SANMARCO, ME
    AZEN, SP
    CASHINHEMPHILL, L
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1987, 257 (23): : 3233 - 3240
  • [5] EXPANDED CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF LOVASTATIN (EXCEL) STUDY RESULTS .1. EFFICACY IN MODIFYING PLASMA-LIPOPROTEINS AND ADVERSE EVENT PROFILE IN 8245 PATIENTS WITH MODERATE HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA
    BRADFORD, RH
    SHEAR, CL
    CHREMOS, AN
    DUJOVNE, C
    DOWNTON, M
    FRANKLIN, FA
    GOULD, AL
    HESNEY, M
    HIGGINS, J
    HURLEY, DP
    LANGENDORFER, A
    NASH, DT
    POOL, JL
    SCHNAPER, H
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1991, 151 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [6] BROWN G, 1990, NEW ENGL J MED, V330, P1291
  • [7] 15 YEAR MORTALITY IN CORONARY DRUG PROJECT PATIENTS - LONG-TERM BENEFIT WITH NIACIN
    CANNER, PL
    BERGE, KG
    WENGER, NK
    STAMLER, J
    FRIEDMAN, L
    PRINEAS, RJ
    FRIEDEWALD, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1986, 8 (06) : 1245 - 1255
  • [8] PRONOUNCED LOWERING OF SERUM LEVELS OF LIPOPROTEIN LP(A) IN HYPERLIPEMIC SUBJECTS TREATED WITH NICOTINIC-ACID
    CARLSON, LA
    HAMSTEN, A
    ASPLUND, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1989, 226 (04) : 271 - 276
  • [9] NICOTINIC ACID TREATMENT OF HYPERCHOLESTEREMIA - COMPARISON OF PLAIN AND SUSTAINED-ACTION PREPARATIONS AND REPORT OF 2 CASES OF JAUNDICE
    CHRISTENSEN, N
    MASON, HL
    BERGE, KG
    ACHOR, RWP
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1961, 177 (08): : 546 - &
  • [10] CLEEMAN JI, 1988, ARCH INTERN MED, V148, P36, DOI 10.1001/archinte.148.1.36