ASSESSMENT OF RESPONSE OF ESOPHAGEAL-CARCINOMA TO INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY

被引:50
作者
HORDIJK, ML [1 ]
KOK, TC [1 ]
WILSON, JHP [1 ]
MULDER, AH [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV HOSP DIJKZIGT,DEPT PATHOL,3015 GD ROTTERDAM,NETHERLANDS
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-1010411
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is currently considered the best available technique for the local staging of esophageal cancer. Tn a prospective study 11 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were investigated to evaluate the usefulness of EUS in the assessment of response to induction chemotherapy. Response to chemotherapy was evaluated by means of history of dysphagia, endoscopy, computed tomography (CT) and EUS to assess relief of clinical symptoms, reduction of tumor bulk and depth of tumor invasion (T-stage). One patient was excluded because EUS failed. Tumor response was best correlated with relief of dysphagia and by tumor bulk reduction as determined on endoscopy and CT. We found it not useful to measure reduction of tumor bulk with EUS because of tumor compression by the instrument, stenosis, or the hypoechoic thickening of the esophageal wall caused by an inflammatory reaction after chemotherapy. There was no change in EUS T-staging after induction chemotherapy compared to pre-chemotherapy assessment. EUS T-staging after induction chemotherapy was accurate in 6 of 10 patients compared to the histopathologic examination of the resected specimen. There was EUS T-3-overstaging in 4 patients, caused by partial or complete replacement of the tumor by an inflammatory reaction due to chemotherapy. We conclude that inflammatory changes induced by chemotherapy lead to EUS overstaging of the T stage thus making it a less reliable tool in restaging after chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:592 / 596
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] CONCURRENT CHEMOTHERAPY AND RADIATION-THERAPY FOLLOWED BY TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR LOCAL-REGIONAL CANCER OF THE ESOPHAGUS
    FORASTIERE, AA
    ORRINGER, MB
    PEREZTAMAYO, C
    URBA, SG
    HUSTED, S
    TAKASUGI, BJ
    ZAHURAK, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1990, 8 (01) : 119 - 127
  • [2] HERMANECK P, 1987, INT UNION CANCER TNM
  • [3] HORDIJK ML, 1993, ENDOSCOPY, V25, P176
  • [4] PREOPERATIVE THERAPY FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER - A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS RADIATION-THERAPY
    KELSEN, DP
    MINSKY, B
    SMITH, M
    BEITLER, J
    NIEDZWIECKI, D
    CHAPMAN, D
    BAINS, M
    BURT, M
    HEELAN, R
    HILARIS, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1990, 8 (08) : 1352 - 1361
  • [5] KITAMURA K, 1991, MED SCI RES, V24, P855
  • [6] ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS, STAGING AND FOLLOW-UP OF ESOPHAGEAL AND GASTRIC-CANCER
    LIGHTDALE, CJ
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 1992, 24 : 297 - 303
  • [7] ACCURACY OF ENDOSONOGRAPHY IN THE STAGING OF RECTAL-CANCER TREATED BY RADIOTHERAPY
    NAPOLEON, B
    PUJOL, B
    BERGER, F
    VALETTE, PJ
    GERARD, JP
    SOUQUET, JC
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (07) : 785 - 788
  • [8] ENDOSONOGRAPHY CAN DETECT RESIDUAL TUMOR INFILTRATION AFTER MEDICAL-TREATMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL CANCER IN THE ABSENCE OF ENDOSCOPIC LESIONS
    NOUSBAUM, JB
    ROBASZKIEWICZ, M
    CAUVIN, JM
    CALAMENT, G
    GOUEROU, H
    [J]. GUT, 1992, 33 (11) : 1459 - 1461
  • [9] TRANS-THORACIC VERSUS TRANSHIATAL ESOPHAGECTOMY - WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE
    ORRINGER, MB
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1987, 44 (02) : 116 - 118
  • [10] ESOPHAGEAL-CARCINOMA - ESOPHAGEAL ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT OF PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY
    RICE, TW
    BOYCE, GA
    SIVAK, MV
    ADELSTEIN, DJ
    KIRBY, TJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1992, 53 (06) : 972 - 977