THE IMPORTANCE OF LOCAL-CONTROL IN THE CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT OF BREAST-CANCER

被引:12
作者
LEVITT, SH [1 ]
AEPPLI, DM [1 ]
NIERENGARTEN, ME [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MINNESOTA,DIV BIOSTAT,MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55455
关键词
D O I
10.3109/02841869509127194
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine the meaning of local control, especially on survival, in breast cancer patients treated by lumpectomy with or without radiotherapy. We analyzed the survival results of four major published randomized trials that compare conservation surgery with or without radiation using three different statistical approaches: p-values, confidence intervals, and Bayesian techniques. All four trials report statistically significant increased local control and improved survival for the irradiated patients. Survival based on p-values and confidence intervals shows statistical significance for long-term follow-up of the NSABP-BOG trial, but not for the other trials, probably because of small sample sizes and short follow-up, At 10 years, the overall survival rates for the NSABP-B06 were 65% and 71% for lumpectomy alone or with radiation respectively. Interpreted in a Bayesian framework, the expected advantage in 10-year survival was 6% (the mean of NSABP-B06 10-year survival) with an 83% probability that the 10-year survival difference may lie between 2% and 10%, An 85% probability that 3% of patients will survive at 10 years because of irradiation translates into a 30% reduction in annual odds of death several years after treatment in stage I good prognosis patients and 15% in stage I poor prognosis patients. Analyses of the randomized trials comparing lumpectomy with or without radiation indicate a clear improvement in survival for the irradiated patients associated with increased local control. Combination of improved survival with the reduced psychological and economic costs associated with local recurrence argues well for the inclusion of radiation for many breast cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:839 / 844
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   PLACING TRIALS IN CONTEXT USING BAYESIAN-ANALYSIS - GUSTO REVISITED BY REVEREND BAYES [J].
BROPHY, JM ;
JOSEPH, L .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (11) :871-875
[2]   PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF BREAST RELAPSE AFTER CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT IN NODE-NEGATIVE EARLY BREAST-CANCER [J].
CHAUVET, B ;
REYNAUDBOUGNOUX, A ;
CALAIS, G ;
PANEL, N ;
LANSAC, J ;
BOUGNOUX, P ;
LEFLOCH, O .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1990, 19 (05) :1125-1130
[3]   SIGNIFICANCE OF IPSILATERAL BREAST-TUMOR RECURRENCE AFTER LUMPECTOMY [J].
FISHER, B ;
ANDERSON, S ;
FISHER, ER ;
REDMOND, C ;
WICKERHAM, DL ;
WOLMARK, N ;
MAMOUNAS, EP ;
DEUTSCH, M ;
MARGOLESE, R .
LANCET, 1991, 338 (8763) :327-331
[4]  
Fleiss JL., 1981, STAT METHODS RATES P, V2
[5]  
HAYWARD J, 1987, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V122, P1244
[6]   NATURAL-HISTORY OF SMALL BREAST CANCERS [J].
HELLMAN, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (10) :2229-2234
[7]  
LEVITT SH, 1994, CANCER, V74, P1840, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19941001)74:7<1840::AID-CNCR2820740703>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-N
[9]   SECTOR RESECTION WITH OR WITHOUT POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY FOR STAGE-I BREAST-CANCER - 5-YEAR RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
LILJEGREN, G ;
HOLMBERG, L ;
ADAMI, HO ;
WESTMAN, G ;
GRAFFMAN, S ;
BERGH, J ;
HUITFELDT, B .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1994, 86 (09) :717-722
[10]   RISK-FACTORS AND MANAGEMENT OF LOCAL RECURRENCE FOLLOWING BREAST-CONSERVATION SURGERY [J].
OSTEEN, RT .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 18 (01) :76-80