LICKING ONE SACCHARIN SOLUTION FOR ACCESS TO ANOTHER IN RATS - CONTINGENT AND NONCONTINGENT EFFECTS IN INSTRUMENTAL PERFORMANCE

被引:16
作者
TIMBERLAKE, W
机构
[1] Psychology Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, 47401, Indiana
来源
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR | 1979年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03209670
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Separation of the contingent and noncontingent effects of a schedule on amount of instrumental responding is desirable but difficult in schedules that involve instrumental and contingent responses that are either highly probable or very similar. Three studies in which rats were required to lick a solution of .1% saccharin for access to a preferred solution of .4% saccharin showed that neither single nor paired operant baselines of the instrumental response allowed accurate separation of the contingent and noncontingent effects of a fixed-ratio schedule. Two within-subject yoking procedures provided the best baselines of noncontingent effects: the massed baseline measured amount of .1% licking when each subject received free access to the total amount of .4% licking it obtained at asymptote under the schedule; the matched baseline measured .1% licking when each subject received the same access to the .4% solution, but presented in the intermittent pattern obtained during the schedule. Of the three algebraic models used to predict noncontingent effects, the substitution model was most promising, but still not adequate. The procedure of a between-subjects yoked control was also not effective. © 1979 Psychonomic Society, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 288
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   RESPONSE DEPRIVATION AND INSTRUMENTAL PERFORMANCE IN CONTROLLED-AMOUNT PARADIGM [J].
ALLISON, J ;
TIMBERLAKE, W .
LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 1975, 6 (01) :122-142
[2]   TEMPORAL CHARACTERISTICS OF NUTRITIVE DRINKING IN RATS AND HUMANS [J].
ALLISON, J ;
CASTELLA.NJ .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 70 (01) :116-&
[3]   INSTRUMENTAL AND CONTINGENT SACCHARIN LICKING IN RATS - RESPONSE DEPRIVATION AND REINFORCEMENT [J].
ALLISON, J ;
TIMBERLAKE, W .
LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 1974, 5 (02) :231-247
[4]  
ALLISON J, 1979, J EXP PSYCHOL GEN, V108, P4, DOI 10.1037/0096-3445.108.1.4
[5]   CONTRAST, INDUCTION, FACILITATION, SUPPRESSION, AND CONSERVATION [J].
ALLISON, J .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1976, 25 (02) :185-198
[6]  
BERLYNE DE, 1979, REINFORCEMENT BEHAVI
[7]   REINFORCEMENT AND SUBSTITUTION IN HUMANS - MULTIPLE-RESPONSE ANALYSIS [J].
BERNSTEIN, DJ ;
EBBESEN, EB .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1978, 30 (03) :243-253
[8]   SYSTEMATIC EFFECT OF RANDOM ERROR IN THE YOKED CONTROL DESIGN [J].
CHURCH, RM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1964, 62 (02) :122-131
[9]  
DUNHAM P, 1977, HDB OPERANT BEHAVIOR
[10]   SOME EFFECTS OF PUNISHMENT UPON UNPUNISHED RESPONDING [J].
DUNHAM, PJ .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1972, 17 (03) :443-&