8 YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH AUTOMATED ANESTHESIA RECORD KEEPING - LESSONS LEARNED - NEW DIRECTIONS TAKEN

被引:15
作者
ABENSTEIN, JP
DEVOS, CB
TARHAN, A
TARHAN, S
机构
[1] Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905, Minnesota
[2] Department of Information Services, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 55905, Minnesota
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING | 1992年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
RECORDS; ANESTHESIA; MONITORING; AUTOMATED RECORD KEEPING; EQUIPMENT; COMPUTERS;
D O I
10.1007/BF01142189
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
For the past eight years, an automated anesthesia record keeping system, COMANDAS (COMputerized ANesthesia Data Acquisition System) has been used in the cardiovascular operating rooms at Mayo Clinic. The automated anesthesia record is designed to match the traditional hand-written record and becomes part of the official medical record. COMANDAS is interfaced with the physiologic monitor and mass spectrometer in each OR, and a number of other computers within the Mayo Medical Center. Since the introduction of COMANDAS over 24,000 surgical procedures have been charted. The anesthesia record is more complete, consistent in organization, and legible when compared to a hand-written record. Recently, it was determined that the computers and peripherals that make up COMANDAS were wearing out and that the vendors would no longer support or replace the equipment. A process to find a replacement for COMANDAS was then begun. Although the cardiovascular anesthesia group was satisfied with the automated anesthesia record, there were a number of areas in which improvement was desired. A systematic evaluation of the system was begun with a survey of the users. The majority of those surveyed felt that COMANDAS was a useful system which made parts of their job easier. The user interface, method of manual data entry, time to produce the record and difficulty learning the system were the source of the greatest dissatisfaction. Artifacts, networking, interfacing with other devices and computers were also issues for the replacement system. Most commercial systems were found wanting in one or more areas of significance. The most practical solution appeared to be the modification of a currently available intensive care unit patient data management system.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 129
页数:13
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Logas W.G., McCarthy R.J., Narbone R.F., Ivankovich A.D., Analysis of the accuracy of the Anesthetic record, Anesthesia & Analgesia, 66, (1987)
  • [2] Cook R., McDonald J.S., Nunciata E., Systemic bias in handwritten anesthetic records, Anesthesiology, 69, (1988)
  • [3] Cook R., McDonald J.S., Nunciata E., Differences between handwritten and automatic blood pressure records, Anesthesiology, 71, pp. 385-90, (1989)
  • [4] Block F.E., normal fluctuation of physiologic cardiovascular variables during anesthesia and the phenomenon of ‘smoothing’, J Clin Monit, 7, pp. 141-5, (1991)
  • [5] Lerou J.G.C., Dirksen R., van Daele M., Et al., Automated charting of physiological variables in anesthesia: A quantitative comparison of automated versus handwritten anesthesia records, J Clin Monit, 4, pp. 37-47, (1988)
  • [6] Gibbs R.F., The present and future medicolegal importance of record keeping in anesthesia and intensive care: The case for automation, J Clin Monit, 5, pp. 251-5, (1989)
  • [7] Gravenstein J.H., The uses of the anesthesia record, J Clin Monit, 5, pp. 256-65, (1989)
  • [8] Eichhorn J.H., Disadvantages of the automated anesthesia records, Safety and cost containment in anesthesia, pp. 223-32, (1988)
  • [9] Gravenstein J.S., Newbower R.S., Ream A.K., Smith N.T., The automated anesthesia record and alarm systems, (1987)
  • [10] Gravenstein J.S., The automated anesthesia record, Int J Clin Monit Comput, 3, pp. 131-4, (1986)