PSYCHOLOGY AND PREJUDICE - A HISTORICAL-ANALYSIS AND INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK

被引:131
作者
DUCKITT, J
机构
[1] University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
[2] University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, PO WITS 2050
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0003-066X.47.10.1182
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
No adequate general theories or integrative framework exist for understanding prejudice. Limited theories have proliferated, and a number of competing paradigms emerged that have been theoretically dominant during quite different historical periods. These systematic shifts do not just represent a systematic evolution of knowledge. A historical analysis focusing on explanations of racial prejudice suggests that different theoretical orientations typically emerged in response to specific social and historical circumstances. It is suggested that these shifts in theoretical orientation represent responses to substantively different but equally valid questions about the nature of the causal processes involved in prejudice. Four such basic causal processes emerge from the analysis that can be combined into an integrative framework providing a reasonably complete understanding of prejudice.
引用
收藏
页码:1182 / 1193
页数:12
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [1] Ackerman Nathan, 1950, ANTISEMITISM EMOTION
  • [2] Adorno T. W., 1950, AUTHORITARIAN PERSON
  • [3] Allport G. W., 1954, NATURE PREJUDICE
  • [4] SOME ROOTS OF PREJUDICE
    Allport, Gordon W.
    Kramer, Bernard M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1946, 22 (01) : 9 - 39
  • [5] Altemeyer RA., 1981, RIGHT WING AUTHORITA
  • [6] Ashmore R. D., 1981, COGN PROCESS, P1
  • [7] ASHMORE RD, 1970, SOCIAL PSYCHOL, P245
  • [8] BABAD EY, 1983, SOCIAL SELF GROUP IN
  • [9] BARTAL D, 1989, STEREOTYPING PREJUDI
  • [10] PERSISTENCE AND CHANGE IN INTER-GROUP RELATIONS - THE CRISIS UPON US
    BLACKWELL, JE
    [J]. SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 1982, 29 (04) : 325 - 346