SENSITIVITY OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE CURRENT-DENSITY IMAGING

被引:219
作者
SCOTT, GC
JOY, MLG
ARMSTRONG, RL
HENKELMAN, RM
机构
[1] UNIV TORONTO, INST BIOMED ENGN, TORONTO M5S 1A4, ONTARIO, CANADA
[2] UNIV TORONTO, DEPT MED BIOPHYS, TORONTO M5S 1A4, ONTARIO, CANADA
[3] UNIV NEW BRUNSWICK, DEPT PHYS, FREDERICTON E3B 5A3, NB, CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0022-2364(92)90310-4
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes the sensitivity of magnetic-resonance current-density imaging (CDI) to random noise and systematic errors with the goal of providing a protocol for achieving a targeted noise performance. All analyses are checked with an electrolytic phantom designed to create a uniform current density or with an equivalent computer model. CDI's sensitivity properties are split between low and high current-time regimes where random noise or systematic error, respectively, dominate. Large current-time products introduce nonlinear signal loss in the magnitude image. Image alignment errors, spatial linearity, pixel size calibration, and current-dependent ringing can exceed random noise. In the low current-time limit, random noise dominates and is proportional to the inverse cube of the planar pixel dimensions. A spin-echo sequence minimizes the current-density noise for current integration times and echo times in the neighborhood of T2. The relation between current-density noise and the MR image resolution and signal-to-noise ratio is formulated, allowing one to predict the noise for experimental planning. The lower practical limit of sensitivity is estimated to be 0.1 A/m2 for a 1.5 × 1.5 × 5 mm voxel. © 1992.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 254
页数:20
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   DATA EXTRAPOLATION FOR TRUNCATION ARTIFACT REMOVAL [J].
CONSTABLE, RT ;
HENKELMAN, RM .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1991, 17 (01) :108-118
[2]   CONTRAST, RESOLUTION, AND DETECTABILITY IN MR IMAGING [J].
CONSTABLE, RT ;
HENKELMAN, RM .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1991, 15 (02) :297-303
[3]  
DECONINCK J, 1990, TOPICS BOUNDARY ELEM, V7, pCH8
[4]   THE INTRINSIC SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO IN NMR IMAGING [J].
EDELSTEIN, WA ;
GLOVER, GH ;
HARDY, CJ ;
REDINGTON, RW .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1986, 3 (04) :604-618
[5]   MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING WITH NONUNIFORM FIELDS [J].
FEIG, E ;
GREENLEAF, F ;
PERLIN, M .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1986, 31 (10) :1091-1099
[6]   RADIOFREQUENCY LOSSES IN NMR EXPERIMENTS ON ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTING SAMPLES [J].
GADIAN, DG ;
ROBINSON, FNH .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1979, 34 (02) :449-455
[7]   ELECTRODYNAMIC SEAWATER JET - AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE PROPELLER [J].
GRANEAU, P .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1989, 25 (05) :3275-3277
[8]   THE EFFECTS OF FINITE SAMPLING IN SPIN-ECHO OR FIELD-ECHO MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING [J].
HAACKE, EM .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1987, 4 (05) :407-421
[9]  
HAYKIN S, 1983, COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
[10]   MAXIMIZING SIGNAL-TO-NOISE AND CONTRAST-TO-NOISE RATIOS IN FLASH IMAGING [J].
HENDRICK, RE ;
KNEELAND, JB ;
STARK, DD .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1987, 5 (02) :117-127