CONCENTRATION MEASUREMENTS AROUND AN ISOLATED BUILDING - A COMPARISON BETWEEN WIND-TUNNEL AND FIELD DATA

被引:41
作者
HIGSON, HL
GRIFFITHS, RF
JONES, CD
HALL, DJ
机构
[1] CHEM & BIOL DEF ESTAB,SALISBURY SP4 0JQ,ENGLAND
[2] WARREN SPRING LAB,STEVENAGE SG1 2BX,HERTS,ENGLAND
关键词
ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION; TRACER; MEAN CONCENTRATION; INTERMITTENCY; BUILDING EFFECTS;
D O I
10.1016/1352-2310(94)90322-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Field experiments have been conducted in flat terrain using a model building, which represents real structures at a scale of between 1/3 and 1/10. The building is rotatable, and thus may be positioned in any orientation relative to the wind direction. A tracer gas is released upwind of the building and detectors are used to measure concentration values at a frequency of 10 Hz. Similar experiments were undertaken at 3/50 of the field scale using a wind tunnel. The measured concentration values are non-dimensionalised to enable the two sets of results to be compared directly. The highest mean concentrations found around the building tend to be over-estimated by the wind tunnel, whilst the minimum concentrations tend to be underestimated. This suggests that there is more dispersion of the plumes in the atmosphere than in the wind tunnel. A likely explanation for this is the differences in turbulence scales relative to the size of the model building. Data sets from the field experiments are also divided into sections each of 5 min duration. This indicates that there is a great deal of variation at a single location throughout each experiment. This is caused by the continual changes in the wind direction (both mean and standard deviation) leading to continual changes in the direction of travel of the plume. Intermittency (the proportion of time for which no gas is observed) and conditional means (which exclude zero sections of data) are calculated. Both parameters exhibit considerable variation between each 5 min period at a single location.
引用
收藏
页码:1827 / 1836
页数:10
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   THE EFFECTS OF SOURCE SIZE ON CONCENTRATION FLUCTUATIONS IN PLUMES [J].
FACKRELL, JE ;
ROBINS, AG .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 1982, 22 (03) :335-350
[2]   AN EXAMINATION OF SIMPLE-MODELS FOR BUILDING INFLUENCED DISPERSION [J].
FACKRELL, JE .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1984, 18 (01) :89-98
[3]   BUILDING WAKE DISPERSION AT AN ARCTIC INDUSTRIAL SITE - FIELD TRACER OBSERVATIONS AND PLUME MODEL EVALUATIONS [J].
GUENTHER, A ;
LAMB, B ;
ALLWINE, E .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1990, 24 (09) :2329-2347
[4]  
HALL DJ, 1993, IN PRESS J AEROSOL S
[5]  
HOSKER RP, 1981, ATMOSPHERIC SCI POWE, pCH7
[7]   AN OVERVIEW OF TEXAS TECHS WIND ENGINEERING FIELD-RESEARCH LABORATORY [J].
LEVITAN, ML ;
MEHTA, KC ;
CHOK, CV ;
MILLSAPS, DL .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 1990, 36 (1-3) :1037-1046
[8]  
MERONEY RN, 1982, ENG METEOROLOGY, pCH11
[9]   A FIELD INVESTIGATION OF THE FLOW AND DIFFUSION AROUND A MODEL CUBE [J].
OGAWA, Y ;
OIKAWA, S .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1982, 16 (02) :207-222
[10]   ESTIMATES OF BUILDING SURFACE CONCENTRATIONS FROM NEARBY POINT SOURCES [J].
WILSON, DJ ;
BRITTER, RE .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1982, 16 (11) :2631-2646