THE INFLUENCE OF ACTIVATOR TREATMENT ON SKELETAL GROWTH IN ANGLE CLASS-II-1 CASES - A ROENTGENOCEPHALOMETRIC STUDY

被引:64
作者
JAKOBSSON, SO [1 ]
PAULIN, G [1 ]
机构
[1] ORTHODONT CTY CLIN,OSTERSUND,SWEDEN
关键词
D O I
10.1093/ejo/12.2.174
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate possible skeletal effects of activator treatment on children with Angle Class II: 1 malocclusions. The material consisted of lateral roentgenocephalograms of 31 girls and 22 boys, 8-14 years of age, who were treated with Andresen activators for an average period of 2.5 years. Growth and treatment effects were determined by comparing measurements on cephalograms of a group of untreated children with the same facial morphology and growth rate. The cephalograms were superimposed on the sella-nasion line and on the internal structures of the mandible.The activator treatment had a significant effect on the sagittal intermaxillary relationship and the anterior facial height. Among the girls the decreased ANB angle was mainly due to a retarded forward growth of the maxilla, while this decrease among the boys depended more on increased mandibular growth. Another feature was the anterior rotation of the mandible in the activator subjects although to a lesser extent than in the control groups. The total amount of condylar growth did not differ between the groups, but the direction of growth did. In the activator groups the growth was in a more superior-posterior direction than among the controls, thus contributing to the increased total length of the mandible in the activator groups. © 1990 European Orthodontic Society.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 184
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]
Andresen V., Haupl K., Petrik L., Funktions-Kieferorthopädie, (1953)
[2]
Baumrind S., Kom E.L., Isaacson R.J., West E.E., Molthen R., Superimpositional assessment of treatment associated changes in the temporo-mandibular joint and the mandibular symphysis, American Journal of Orthodontics, 84, pp. 443-465, (1983)
[3]
Birkebaeck L., Meisen B., Terp S., A laminographic study of the alterations in the temporo-mandibular joint following activator treatment, European Journal of Orthodontics, 6, pp. 257-266, (1984)
[4]
Bishara S.E., Fahl J.E., Peterson L.C., Longitudinal changes in the ANB angle and Wits appraisal: Clinical implications, American Journal of Orthodontics, 84, pp. 133-139, (1983)
[5]
Bjork A., Prediction of mandibular growth rotation, American Journal of Orthodontics, 55, pp. 585-599, (1969)
[6]
Bjork A., Kaebernes relation til det ovrige kranium, Nordisk lärobok I Ortodonti. Sveriges Tandläkarförbunds Förlagsförening, pp. 69-110, (1980)
[7]
Ehmer U., Zu Formveränderungen der Mandibula under Therapie und Wachstum bei skelettaler Underkieferrucks-lage und dentoalveolärer Klasse 11,1, Fortschritte der Kieferorthopedi, 46, pp. 249-260, (1985)
[8]
Harvold E., Vargervik K., Morphogenetic response to activator treatment, American Journal of Orthodontics, 60, pp. 478-490, (1971)
[9]
Hinton R.J., McNamara J.A., Temporal bone adaptions in response to protrusive function in juvenile and young adult rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatto), European Journal of Orthodontics, 6, pp. 155-174, (1984)
[10]
Jacobson A., The ‘Wits’ appraisal of jaw disharmony, American Journal of Orthodontics, 67, pp. 125-138, (1975)