Assessing the Influence of No Child Left Behind on Gifted Education Funding in Texas: A Descriptive Study

被引:11
作者
Hodges, Jaret [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Talent Identificat Program, Durham, NC USA
关键词
No Child Left Behind; gifted education; urban; rural; suburban; longitudinal;
D O I
10.1177/1932202X18779343
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) has defined the past 15 years of public K-12 education. An incentive structure built around adequate yearly progress created an environment that was not aligned with gifted education. Texas, with over 11% of the total identified gifted population in the United States, state funding for gifted, and incentivized identification policies, made an ideal case study to analyze the ramifications of NCLB on gifted education. This article explores how Texas responded to NCLB and that response's influence on district-level funding for gifted education. In total, 16 years of financial and enrollment data were analyzed for the 1,025 public school districts in Texas using the frame work of a longitudinal mixed model. Results indicated that there was an annual decline in the percentage of budget allocated to gifted education of 0.04 percentage points for rural school districts, 0.08 for suburban, 0.07 for town, and 0.05 for urban.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 342
页数:22
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Living on the edges of state school-funding policies: The plight of at-risk, limited-English-proficient, and gifted children [J].
Baker, BD .
EDUCATIONAL POLICY, 2001, 15 (05) :699-723
[2]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[3]  
Confrey J., 2002, A CONTENT ANAL OF EX
[4]   The Effects of NCLB on School Resources and Practices [J].
Dee, Thomas S. ;
Jacob, Brian ;
Schwartz, Nathaniel L. .
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS, 2013, 35 (02) :252-279
[5]   The Impact of No Child Left Behind on Student Achievement [J].
Dee, Thomas S. ;
Jacob, Brian .
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 30 (03) :418-U60
[6]  
Dee TS, 2010, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, P149
[7]  
Faraway J. J, 2014, LINEAR MODELS R
[8]   Segregation and the Underrepresentation of Blacks and Hispanics in Gifted Education: Social Inequality and Deficit Paradigms [J].
Ford, Donna .
ROEPER REVIEW-A JOURNAL ON GIFTED EDUCATION, 2014, 36 (03) :143-154
[9]  
Gallagher J. J., 2004, ROEPER REV, V26, P121, DOI [10.1080/02783190409554255, DOI 10.1080/02783190409554255]
[10]   No Child Left Behind: Neglecting Excellence [J].
Gentry, Marcia .
ROEPER REVIEW-A JOURNAL ON GIFTED EDUCATION, 2006, 29 (01) :24-27