DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS PROPERTIES OF COCAINE - NEURO-PHARMACOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AS DERIVED FROM STIMULUS-GENERALIZATION EXPERIMENTS

被引:153
作者
COLPAERT, FC
NIEMEGEERS, CJE
JANSSEN, PAJ
机构
[1] Department of Pharmacology, Janssen Pharmaceutica Research Laboratories
关键词
Amphetamines; CNS stimulants; Cocaine cue; DA agonists; Dopamine; Drug cue; Drug discrimination; Hallucinogens; Narcotics; Propranolol; Psychotomimertic drugs; Reinforcement; Stimulus generalization;
D O I
10.1016/0091-3057(79)90229-6
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The experiments reported here were undertaken to examine the neuropharmacological characteristics of drugs inducing stimulus generalization with cocaine as a cue. Experiment 1 indicated that d-amphetamine (ED50: 0.17 mg/kg), 1-amphetamine (0.45 mg/kg), methylamphetamine (0.15 mg/kg), methylphenidate (0.55 mg/kg) and nomifensine (0.32 mg/kg) induce stimulus generalization with cocaine in rats trained to discriminate 10 mg/kg cocaine from saline; this generalization occurred in 100% of the animals, proceeded along steep slopes (s: 1.27 to 1.88 in log-probit plots), and was not associated with behaviorally toxic effects. Amantadine (57.8 mg/kg; s=1.85), apomorphine (0.33 mg/kg; s=1.77), piribedil (8.4 mg/kg; s=10.6) and bromocryptine (>40 mg/kg) also induced stimulus generalization to some extent, but this generalization was partial in some cases, proceeded along a shallow slope with piribedil, and was invariably associated with severe rate depressant effects. Ten mg/kg, but not 1.25 mg/kg hydroxyamphetamine induced generalization in 3 out of 8 rats. Experiment 2 revealed that tranylcrypromine (2.5 mg/kg; s=1.7), fentanyl (0.068 mg/kg; s=1.34), morphine (>10 mg/kg), phencyclidine (0.81 mg/kg; s=1.43), and benztropine (9.2 mg/kg) induce stimulus generalization with cocaine, whereas lidocaine, procaine, chlordiazepoxide, imipramine, desipramine, mescaline, LSD, isopropamide, and atropine do not. Experiment 3 shows that propranolol (1.25 to 40 mg/kg) and isoproterenol (0.63 to 2.5 mg/kg) induce a biphasic generalization with cocaine. Experiment 4 discloses that rats trained to discriminate 10 mg/kg propranolol from saline generalize their training drug along a linear gradient, but generalize cocaine along a biphasic gradient. It is suggested (a) that stimulus generalization with cocaine may be contingent upon increasing the functional availability of endogenous dopamine and, perhaps, of norepinephrine irrespective of the presynaptic mechanism from which such increase may result and (b) that differential stimulus generalization of drugs with cocaine (in terms of dose, subjects, slope, and rate effects) may parallel their differential primary reinforcing properties. © 1979.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 546
页数:12
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
ANDO K, 1978, STIMULUS PROPERTIES, P125
[2]   COMPARATIVE PSYCHOTOMIMETIC EFFECTS OF STEREOISOMERS OF AMPHETAMINE [J].
ANGRIST, BM ;
SHOPSIN, B ;
GERSHON, S .
NATURE, 1971, 234 (5325) :152-&
[3]  
BALSTER R L, 1973, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, V1, P67, DOI 10.1016/0091-3057(73)90057-9
[4]  
BALSTER RL, 1973, PHARMACOL BIOCHEM BE, V1, P167
[5]   SELF-INJECTION OF APOMORPHINE IN RAT - POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT BY A DOPAMINE RECEPTOR STIMULANT [J].
BAXTER, BL ;
GLUCKMAN, MI ;
STEIN, L ;
SCERNI, RA .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1974, 2 (03) :387-391
[6]   COMPARISON OF SOME PROPERTIES OF PRONETHALOL AND PROPRANOLOL [J].
BLACK, JW ;
DUNCAN, WAM ;
SHANKS, RG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1965, 25 (03) :577-+
[7]   BIOCHEMICAL DIFFERENTIATION OF AMPHETAMINE VS METHYLPHENIDATE AND NOMIFENSINE IN RATS [J].
BRAESTRUP, C .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1977, 29 (08) :463-470
[8]  
BRANCH RA, 1973, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V184, P515
[9]  
BRANCH RA, 1973, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V187, P133
[10]   BIOCHEMICAL AND HISTOCHEMICAL STUDIES ON EFFECTS OF IMIPRAMINE-LIKE DRUGS AND (+)-AMPHETAMINE ON CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL CATECHOLAMINE NEURONS [J].
CARLSSON, A ;
FUXE, K ;
HAMBERGER, B ;
LINDQVIST, M .
ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1966, 67 (3-4) :481-+