MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS OF AN INVACUO MODEL OF DUPLEX D(CGCGAATTCGCG) IN THE B-FORM BASED ON THE AMBER-3.0 FORCE-FIELD

被引:37
作者
SRINIVASAN, J
WITHKA, JM
BEVERIDGE, DL
机构
[1] Department of Chemistry, Hall-Atwater Laboratories, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82397-3
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
The characteristics of 100 ps of molecular dynamics (MD) on the DNA dodecamer d(CGCGAATTCGCG) at 300 K are described and investigated. The simulation is based on an in vacuo model of the oligomer and the AMBER 3.0 force field configured in the manner of Singh, U. C., S. J. Weiner, and P. A. Kollman, (1985, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 82:755–759). The analysis of the results was carried out using the "curves, dials, and windows" procedure (Ravishanker, G., S. Swaminathan, D. L. Beveridge, R. Lavery, and H. Sklenar. 1989. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 6:669–699). The results indicate this dynamical model to be a provisionally stable double helix which lies at approximately 3.2 A rms deviation from the canonical B-form. There is, however, a persistent nonplanarity in the base pair orientations which resemble that observed in canonical A-DNA. The major groove width is seen to narrow during the course of the simulation and the minor groove expands, contravariant to the alterations in groove width seen in the crystal structure of the native dodecamer (Drew, H. R., R. M. Wing, T. Takano, C. Broka, S. Tanaka, I. Itakura, and R. E. Dickerson, 1981. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 78:2179–2183). The propeller twist in the bases, the sequence dependence of the base pair roll and aspects of bending in the helix axis are in some degree of agreement with the crystal structure. The patterns in DNA bending are observed to follow Zhurkin theory (Zhurkin, V. B. 1985. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2:785–804.). The relationship between the dynamical model and structure in solution is discussed. © 1990, The Biophysical Society. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 547
页数:15
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   OPTIMIZED PARAMETERS FOR A-DNA AND B-DNA [J].
ARNOTT, S ;
HUKINS, DWL .
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 1972, 47 (06) :1504-&
[2]  
ARNOTT S, 1973, J MOL BIOL, P8193
[3]   A-CONFORMATIONS AND B-CONFORMATIONS OF DNA AND RNA SUBUNITS - POTENTIAL-ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR DGPDC [J].
BROYDE, SB ;
STELLMAN, SD ;
WARTELL, RM .
BIOPOLYMERS, 1975, 14 (12) :2625-2637
[4]  
DAVIES DB, 1983, EUR J BIOCHEM, V131, P9
[5]  
DICKERSON R, 1981, J MOL BIOL, V151, P535
[6]   STRUCTURE OF A B-DNA DODECAMER .2. INFLUENCE OF BASE SEQUENCE ON HELIX STRUCTURE [J].
DICKERSON, RE ;
DREW, HR .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1981, 149 (04) :761-786
[7]  
DICKERSON RE, 1988, UNUSUAL DNA STRUCTUR
[8]   FLOW DICHROISM EVIDENCE FOR TILTING OF THE BASES WHEN DNA IS IN SOLUTION [J].
DOUGHERTY, AM ;
CAUSLEY, GC ;
JOHNSON, WC .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1983, 80 (08) :2193-2195
[9]   STRUCTURE OF A B-DNA DODECAMER - CONFORMATION AND DYNAMICS .1. [J].
DREW, HR ;
WING, RM ;
TAKANO, T ;
BROKA, C ;
TANAKA, S ;
ITAKURA, K ;
DICKERSON, RE .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1981, 78 (04) :2179-2183
[10]  
FRANTINI AV, 1982, J BIOL CHEM, V257, P14686