THE MINIMALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE SIGNIFICANT CRITERION FOR SAMPLE-SIZE

被引:18
作者
HARRIS, RJ [1 ]
QUADE, D [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV N CAROLINA,SCH PUBL HLTH,DEPT BIOSTAT,CHAPEL HILL,NC 27514
来源
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STATISTICS | 1992年 / 17卷 / 01期
关键词
POWER; SAMPLE SIZE;
D O I
10.3102/10769986017001027
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
For a wide range of tests of single-df hypotheses, the sample size needed to achieve 50% power is readily approximated by setting N such that a significance test conducted on data that fit one's assumptions perfectly just barely achieves statistical significance at one's chosen alpha level. If the effect size assumed in establishing one's N is the minimally important effect size (i.e., that effect size such that population differences or correlations smaller than that are not any practical or theoretical significance, whether statistically significant or not), then 50% power is optimal, because the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis should be greater than .5 when the population difference is of practical or theoretical significance but lower than .5 when it is not. Moreover, the actual power of the test in this case will be considerably higher than .5, exceeding .95 for a population difference two or more times as large as the minimally important difference (MID). This minimally important difference significant (MIDS) criterion extends naturally to specific comparisons following (or substituting for) overall tests such as the ANOVA F and chi-square for contingency tables, although the power of the overall test (i.e., the probability of finding some statistically significant specific comparison) is considerably greater than .5 when the MIDS criterion is applied to the overall test. However, the proper focus for power computations is one or more specific comparisons (rather than the omnibus test), and the MIDS criterion is well suited to setting sample size on this basis. Whereas N(MIDS) (the sample size specified by the MIDS criterion) is much too small for the case in which we wish to prove the modified H0 that there is no important population effect, it nonetheless provides a useful metric for specifying the necessary sample size. In particular, the sample size needed to have a 1 - alpha probability that the (1 - alpha)-level confidence interval around one's population parameter includes no important departure from H0 is four times N(MIDS) when H0 is true and approximately [4/(1 - b)2]. N(MIDS) when b (the ratio between the actual population difference and the minimally important difference) is between zero and unity. The MIDS criterion for sample size provides a useful alternative to the methods currently most commonly employed and taught.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 49
页数:23
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   SPLITTING TAILS UNEQUALLY - NEW PERSPECTIVE ON ONE-TAILED VERSUS 2-TAILED TESTS [J].
BRAVER, SL .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1975, 35 (02) :283-301
[2]  
BREWER JK, 1972, AM EDUC RES J, V9, P246
[3]   STATISTICAL POWER ANALYSIS OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH [J].
CHASE, LJ ;
CHASE, RB .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1976, 61 (02) :234-237
[6]  
COHEN JV, 1977, STATISTICAL POWER AN
[7]  
GAITO J, 1987, B PSYCHONOMIC SOC, V25, P283
[8]  
HOWELL DC, 1987, STATISTICAL METHODS
[9]  
Kraemer H. C., 1985, J EDUC STATIST, V10, P173
[10]  
ROSSI J, 1983, APR M E PSYCH ASS PH