REVEALING AND NOT REVEALING THE STATUS OF ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS TO SOCIAL NETWORKS

被引:30
作者
BAXTER, LA [1 ]
WIDENMANN, S [1 ]
机构
[1] LEWIS & CLARK COLL,PORTLAND,OR 97219
关键词
D O I
10.1177/0265407593103002
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The researchers conducted retrospective interviews with 101 university-level participants to determine what they did to make their developing romantic relationship known to social network members and what they did to keep their relationship from becoming known. The most frequent topic of both revelation and concealment was information on the relationship's status and progress. Strategic disclosure and manipulation of co-presence signals were the most frequent ways in which information was managed. The most frequent reasons for revelation were felt obligation to reveal based on the relationship with the target, the desire for emotional expression and the desire for psychological support from the target. The most frequent reason to withhold information was the anticipation of a negative reaction from the target. Parents were more likely than others in the respondent's network to be the target of concealment acts, whereas close friends of the respondent were less likely than others to have information withheld. Parties in closer relationships were more likely than those in less close relationships to perform jointly enacted acts and acts directed toward members of the partner's network or the joint network.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 337
页数:17
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Altman I., 1973, SOCIAL PENETRATION D
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, RELATIONS PUBLIC
[3]   CLOSE FRIENDSHIP IN ADULTHOOD - CONVERSATIONAL CONTENT BETWEEN SAME-SEX FRIENDS [J].
ARIES, EJ ;
JOHNSON, FL .
SEX ROLES, 1983, 9 (12) :1183-1196
[4]  
Baxter L. A., 1988, HDB PERSONAL RELATIO
[5]   TABOO TOPICS IN CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS [J].
BAXTER, LA ;
WILMOT, WW .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 1985, 2 (03) :253-269
[6]   TURNING-POINTS IN DEVELOPING ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS [J].
BAXTER, LA ;
BULLIS, C .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1986, 12 (04) :469-493
[7]   CONCEPTS IN THE ANALYSIS OF QUALITATIVE DATA [J].
BULMER, M .
SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1979, 27 (04) :651-677
[8]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[9]  
EGGERT LL, 1987, COMMUNICATION YB, V10
[10]  
GINSBURG GP, 1986, EMERGING FIELD PERSO