BOND STRENGTH OF 6 DENTINAL ADHESIVES

被引:31
作者
HOLTAN, JR [1 ]
NYSTROM, GP [1 ]
OLIN, PS [1 ]
PHELPS, RA [1 ]
PHILLIPS, JJ [1 ]
DOUGLAS, WH [1 ]
机构
[1] MILLSAPS COLL,ELSE SCH MANAGEMENT,JACKSON,MS 39210
关键词
DENTIN; DENTIN ADHESIVES; BOND STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/0300-5712(94)90008-6
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This study compared the shear bond strengths on dentine of five dentine adhesives against Scotchbond 2 as a control. Dentine specimens from 225 extracted human permanent molar teeth were used in a matched-pair design, such that 45 tooth sides were treated along with the matching control for each of the five test materials. Shear bond strength testing was conducted 24 h after the completion of each specimen. Results showed that mean force (MPa) for the materials were: XR Bond, 17.1 +/- 5.1; Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, 15.9 +/- 6.5, Syntac, 13.5 +/- 8.6; All-Bond 2, 6.2 +/- 4.1; Scotchbond 2 (control composite score), 4.9 +/- 3.0; Denthesive, 3.4 +/- 1.7. Matched pair t-test comparisons with Scotchbond 2 control were: YR Bond, P = 0.0005; Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, P = 0.0005, Syntac, P = 0.0005; All-Bond 2, P = 0.0368; Denthesive, P = 0.005. Analysis of variance determined a statistically significant difference (P = 0.05) between the means of the bond strengths, which fell into four groups: Group A, XR Bond and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, Group B, Syntac; Group C, All-Bond 2 and Scotchbond 2; Group D, Scotchbond 2 and Denthesive. In Group C, there was no significant difference between Scotchbond 2 and All-Bond 2. In Group D there was no significant difference between Scotchbond 2 and Denthesive, however, there was significant difference between All-Bond 2 and Denthesive. It was concluded that XR Bond and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose had significantly better shear bond strength than the other dentine adhesives.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 96
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
ASMUSSEN E, 1985, POSTERIOR COMPOSITE, P217
[2]  
BOWEN RL, 1985, INT DENT J, V35, P155
[3]   STATHERIN - A MAJOR BOUNDARY LUBRICANT OF HUMAN SALIVA [J].
DOUGLAS, WH ;
REEH, ES ;
RAMASUBBU, N ;
RAJ, PA ;
BHANDARY, KK ;
LEVINE, MJ .
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 1991, 180 (01) :91-97
[4]  
EDLER TL, 1991, J DENT RES, V70, P458
[5]   SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF CUT TOOTH SURFACES AND IDENTIFICATION OF DEBRIS BY USE OF ELECTRON MICROPROBE [J].
EICK, JD ;
WILKO, RA ;
ANDERSON, CH ;
SORENSEN, SE .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1970, 49 (06) :1359-&
[6]  
Erickson R L, 1989, Am J Dent, V2 Spec No, P117
[7]   DENTIN BONDING SYSTEMS - A REVIEW OF CURRENT PRODUCTS AND TECHNIQUES [J].
JOHNSON, GH ;
POWELL, LV ;
GORDON, GE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 122 (08) :34-41
[8]  
JOYNT RB, 1991, OPER DENT, V16, P186
[9]   THE USE OF GLASS-IONOMER CEMENTS IN BONDING COMPOSITE RESINS TO DENTIN [J].
MCLEAN, JW ;
POWIS, DR ;
PROSSER, HJ ;
WILSON, AD .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1985, 158 (11) :410-414
[10]  
NETER J, APPLIED STATISTICS