THE SURFACE FREE-ENERGIES OF TALC AND PYROPHYLLITE

被引:129
作者
GIESE, RF
COSTANZO, PM
VANOSS, CJ
机构
[1] SUNY BUFFALO,DEPT MICROBIOL,BUFFALO,NY 14214
[2] SUNY BUFFALO,DEPT CHEM ENGN,BUFFALO,NY 14214
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF00203840
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The components of the interfacial surface tension of talc and pyrophyllite were determined by measuring the rate of the capillary rise of a number of liquids through thin, sedimented deposits of the powdered minerals. The rate of capillary rise of a liquid in a powder is related to the contact angle between the liquid and the solid by the Washburn equation. The contact angles thus derived were used to determine the apolar (Lifshitz-van der Waals) component, gamma-LW, and the polar, electron-acceptor and electron-donor parameters, gamma+ and gamma- respectively, of the Lewis acid/base component of the total interfacial surface energy using the Young equation. The values of gamma-LW for talc and pyrophyllite (31.5 and 34.4 mJ/m2) are slightly smaller than for smectite clay minerals (e.g., the value for hectorite is 39.9 mJ/m2), the electron donor parameter values are roughly comparable for talc and pyrophyllite (gamma+ = 2.4 and 1.7 mJ/m2) as are the values of the electron acceptor parameter (gamma- = 2.7 and 3.2 mJ/m2). The well-known hydrophobicity of these two minerals is due to the remarkably small value (for silicate minerals) of gamma-(gamma+ is normally small or zero for silicates and many other oxides). The small values of both gamma+ and gamma- mean that the Lewis acid/base interactions between talc or pyrophyllite and highly polar water molecules are very weak. In contrast, low-charge smectites, the minerals most similar chemically and structurally to talc and pyrophyllite, have much greater values of gamma- (greater-than-or-equal-to mJ/m2) and are hydrophyllic.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 616
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
BARTELL FE, 1936, J AM CHEM SOC, V57, P1449
[2]   BOND VALENCES - SIMPLE STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR INORGANIC-CHEMISTRY [J].
BROWN, ID .
CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS, 1978, 7 (03) :359-376
[3]  
Chaudhury M.K., 1984, THESIS, P215
[4]   DETERMINATION OF THE ACID-BASE CHARACTERISTICS OF CLAY MINERAL SURFACES BY CONTACT-ANGLE MEASUREMENTS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ADSORPTION OF ORGANIC SOLUTES FROM AQUEOUS-MEDIA [J].
COSTANZO, PM ;
GIESE, RF ;
VANOSS, CJ .
JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1990, 4 (04) :267-275
[5]  
Fowkes F. M., 1983, PHYSICOCHEMICAL ASPE, P583
[7]  
GIESE RF, 1989, SURFACE ENERGIES SOM
[8]   A THEORY FOR ESTIMATION OF SURFACE AND INTERFACIAL ENERGIES .3. ESTIMATION OF SURFACE ENERGIES OF SOLIDS FROM CONTACT ANGLE DATA [J].
GOOD, RJ ;
GIRIFALCO, LA .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1960, 64 (05) :561-565
[9]   CRITICAL SURFACE-TENSION OF WETTING AND FLOTATION SEPARATION OF HYDROPHOBIC SOLIDS [J].
KELEBEK, S ;
SMITH, GW ;
FINCH, JA ;
YORUK, S .
SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1987, 22 (06) :1527-1546
[10]  
KELEBEK S, 1987, T I MIN METALL C, P103