YOU CAN GO HOME AGAIN - RETURNING GROUP RESEARCH TO THE GROUP CONTEXT WITH AN EYE ON DEVELOPMENTAL ISSUES

被引:31
作者
WORCHEL, S
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1177/1046496494252004
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Much of the research on group behavior especially that involving social cognition, has been conducted outside the group setting and devoid of social interaction. Some of the reasons for this include the view that group factors (especially developmental factors) are unimportant, the difficulty of conducting group-based research, and the lack of compatible group theories to guide the research. This is an unfortunate oversight because the practice fails to include many group variables that are important to the behaviors under study, and the research fails to contribute to our understanding of group dynamics. One of the variables overlooked when research is removed from the group setting is influence of group development A model of group development is presented suggesting that development occurs through the cyclical stages of Discontent, Precipitating Incident, Identification, Group Productivity, Individuation, and Decay. The model offers specific hypotheses about a host of social behaviors and cognitions. Some of these predictions are identified, and a research program testing these predictions is briefly reviewed. It is argued that these development factors are important for understanding and predicting group behaviors and cognitions about groups. Methodology for conducting group research is discussed, and a call for more descriptive research is made. Overall, it is argued that the most productive approach to studying groups is a balanced one that includes efforts to examine behaviors both within and outside the group setting, and uses both analytical methodologies as well as descriptive methods.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 223
页数:19
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], WHEN PROPHECY FAILS
[2]   PHASES IN GROUP PROBLEM-SOLVING [J].
BALES, RF ;
STRODTBECK, FL .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1951, 46 (04) :485-495
[3]  
CANTOR N, 1981, PERSONALITY COGNITIO
[4]  
CRANO W, 1989, 3RD WORKSH MIN INFL
[5]  
Festinger L., 1950, SOCIAL PRESSURES INF
[6]   MARKING TIME - PREDICTABLE TRANSITIONS IN TASK GROUPS [J].
GERSICK, CJG .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1989, 32 (02) :274-309
[7]  
GOETHALS GR, 1977, SOCIAL COMP PROCESSE
[8]  
Gottman J. M., 1981, TIME SERIES ANAL COM
[9]   CONTEXT-DEPENDENT VARIATION IN SOCIAL STEREOTYPING .2. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FRAME OF REFERENCE, SELF-CATEGORIZATION AND ACCENTUATION [J].
HASLAM, SA ;
TURNER, JC .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 22 (03) :251-277
[10]  
Jackson S.E., 1992, GROUP PROCESS PRODUC