Cross comparison of US, EU, JP and Korean companies patenting activity in Japan and in the Peoples Republic of China

被引:12
作者
O'Keeffe, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Kroll Japan & Korea, Chiyoda Ku, 14F AIG Bldg,1-3,Marunouchi,1 Chome, Tokyo 1000005, Japan
关键词
Patent activity; Filing statistics; Grant statistics; China; US companies; European companies; Japanese companies; Korean companies;
D O I
10.1016/j.wpi.2004.11.005
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The purpose of this article is to compare and contrast the patent filing statistics of selected US, European, Japanese and Korean companies in Japan and China with their granted patent statistics in the USA to discern patenting in China trends. The companies are IBM, Canon, Hitachi, Fujitsu, SONY, NEC, Toshiba, Mitsubishi Electric, Matsushita, Samsung, LG Electronics, Siemens, Philips, Intel, Motorola, General Electric, Hewlett Packard, Lucent Technologies, Procter & Gamble, 3M and Kodak, and comparison charts are provided for each. The results suggest that a number of major Korean and European companies are now filing as many applications in China, and for LG Electronics twice as many, as the numbers of US granted patents they are obtaining. For most of the selected Japanese companies Chinese filings are now about half that of their US grants. For the selected US companies, the comparison is rather different because US grants result from home filings, but indicate that these companies are only filing Chinese applications, and also often Japanese applications too, at a rate that is a small fraction of their US grants. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 134
页数:10
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]  
Bosworth D., 2000, INT BUSINESS REV, V9, P453, DOI [10.1016/S0969-5931(00)00013-5, DOI 10.1016/S0969-5931(00)00013-5]
[2]   Intellectual property rights in China: The changing political economy of Chinese-American interests [J].
La Croix, SJ ;
Konan, DE .
WORLD ECONOMY, 2002, 25 (06) :759-788
[3]  
Shen Y., 1989, WORLD PATENT INFORM, V11, P38
[4]  
Sun Y., 2003, WORLD PATENT INF, V25, P27, DOI 10.1016/S0172-2190(02)00086-8
[5]  
Wu C., 2004, World Patent Information, V26, P225, DOI 10.1016/j.wpi.2003.12.008
[6]  
Yang D., 2003, INTELLECTUAL PROPERT