LONG-TERM CLINICAL AND ANGIOGRAPHIC FOLLOW-UP AFTER PLACEMENT OF PALMAZ-SCHATZ CORONARY STENT - A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE

被引：26

作者：

KIMURA, T

TAMURA, T

YOKOI, H

NOBUYOSHI, M

机构：

[1] The Department of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyushu

来源：

JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY | 1994年 / 7卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1540-8183.1994.tb00896.x

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

The purpose of this study is to evaluate long-term clinical and angiographic follow-up results after placement of the Palmaz-Schatz stent and angiographic follow-up results of repeat interventions for stent restenosis. From June 1990 to September 1993, the Palmaz-Schatz stent was placed in 411 patients, 427 lesions. Follow-up angiography was performed in 307 lesions at 3-6 months and in 189 lesions at 1 year. Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation resulted in 97.2% procedure success and 94.6% clinical success. Stent thrombosis was observed in 2.2%. Angiographic restenosis rate was 16.3% at 3-6 months study. At 1 year study, ''new'' restenosis occurred only in 2.3%. Minimal lumen diameter did not change between 6 months and 1 year (2.32 +/- 0.51 mm vs 2.30 +/- 0.54 mm). With the mean follow-up interval of 22 +/- 9 months, cardiac event-free survival was achieved in 74.3%. Among 50 lesions with restenosis, stent restenosis occurred diffusely in 15 lesions (30%), focally inside the stent in 22 lesions (44%) and focally at the stent border in 13 lesions (26%). Repeat interventions were performed in 35 lesions. Restenosis at 3 months after repeat intervention was demonstrated in 9 (32.1%) out of 28 lesions restudied. Restenosis rate after repeat intervention for diffuse stent restenosis was significantly higher than that for focal in-stent restenosis (75% vs 7.7%). Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation was associated with a high initial success rate and a low late restenosis rate. Luminal renarrowing did not occur beyond 6 months up to 1 year.

引用

页码：129 / 139

页数：11

共 17 条

[1]

Nobuyoshi M, Kimura T, Nosaka H, Et al., Restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: Serial angiographic follow‐up of 229 patients, JACC, 12, pp. 616-623, (1988)

[2]

Serruys PW, Luijten HE, Beatt KJ, Et al., Incidence of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty: A time‐related phenomenon, Circulation, 77, pp. 361-371, (1988)

[3]

Hirshfeld JW, Schwartz JS, Jugo R, Et al., Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: A multivariate statistical model to relate lesion and procedure variables to restenosis, JACC, 18, pp. 647-656, (1991)

[4]

Hinohara T, Robertson GC, Selmon NR, Et al., Restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy, JACC, 20, pp. 623-632, (1992)

[5]

Topol EJ, Leya F, Pinkerton CA, Et al., A comparison of directional coronary atherectomy with coronary angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease, N Engl J Med, 329, pp. 221-227, (1993)

[6]

Ellis SG, Savage M, Fischman D, Et al., Restenosis after placement of Palmaz‐Schatz stents in native coronary arteries

[7]

Initial results of multicenter experience, Circulation, 86, pp. 1836-1844, (1992)

[8]

Schatz RA, Goldberg S, Leon MB, Et al., Clinical experience with the Palmaz‐Schatz coronary stent, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 17, pp. 155B-159B, (1991)

[9]

Carrozza JP, Kuntz RE, Levine HJ, Et al., Angiographic and clinical outcome of intracoronary stenting: Immediate and long‐term results from a large single center experience, JACC, 20, pp. 328-337, (1992)

[10]

Kuntz RE, Gibson CM, Nobuyoshi M, Et al., Generalized model of restenosis after conventional balloon angioplasty, stenting, and directional atherectomy, JACC, 21, pp. 15-25, (1993)

← 1 2 →