MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY FOR GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX - LAPAROSCOPIC PLACEMENT OF THE ANGELCHIK PROSTHESIS IN PIGS

被引:15
作者
BERGUER, R
STIEGMANN, GV
YAMAMOTO, M
KIM, J
MANSOUR, A
DENTON, J
NORTON, LW
ANGELCHIK, JP
机构
[1] Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Health Science Center, Denver, 80262, CO
[2] Denver Veterans Administration, Denver, 80262, CO
[3] Phoenix Baptist Hospital, Denver, 80262, CO
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 1991年 / 5卷 / 03期
关键词
GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX; ANGELCHIK PROSTHESIS; LAPAROSCOPY; PIG; ESOPHAGEAL MANOMETRY; LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER;
D O I
10.1007/BF02653217
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Conventional surgery for gastroesophageal reflux is effective but requires laparotomy. Minimal access surgery for gastroesophageal reflux could provide a decrease in morbidity. The Angelchik antireflux prosthesis is an alternative to fundoplication for the treatment of this ailment. We evaluated the results of laparoscopic placement of the Angelchik prosthesis in 10 pigs. The duration of the procedure averaged 44 min. The mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure increased from 12.2 +/- 2.8 mmHg at baseline to 45.2 +/- 7.8 (P < 0.05), 32.1 +/- 3.9 (P < 0.05), and 25.1 +/- 6.5 mmHg (P > 0.05) as measured immediately postoperatively, at 1 week, and at 3 weeks, respectively, following placement of the prosthesis. There was no instance of prosthetic migration or esophageal perforation. One postoperative death due to distention and perforation of the colon occurred. Two animals developed distal esophageal impaction of food. We conclude that the antireflux prosthesis can be safely and effectively placed using laparoscopic methods in a porcine model. Further development of this technique is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 126
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Angelchik J.P., Cohen R., A new surgical procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux and hiatal hernia, Surg Gynecol Obstet, 148, pp. 246-248, (1979)
  • [2] Angelchik P.D., Angelchik J.P., The antireflux prosthesis: simple, effective therapy for gastroesophageal reflux, Debates in clinical surgery, pp. 98-110, (1991)
  • [3] Cohen D.J., Benjamin S.B., Graeber G.M., Castell D.O., Patrick, Dachman A., Friedman A., Evaluation of the Angelchik antireflux prothesis using a model for esophageal reflux in rhesus monkeys, Ann Thorac Surg, 41, pp. 135-142, (1986)
  • [4] Dawson K., Ryan R., Donovan M., Hennessy T.P.J., Prospective randomized trial of Angelchik prosthesis versus Nissen fundoplication, Gut, 26, (1985)
  • [5] DeMeester T.R., Johnson L.F., Kent A.H., Evaluation of current operations for the prevention of gastroesophageal reflux, Ann Surg, 180, pp. 511-525, (1974)
  • [6] Donahue P.E., Carvalho J.P.C., Davis P.E., Shen Y.J.E., Miidla I., Bornbeck C.T., Nyhus L.M., Endoscopic sclerosis of the gastric cardia for prevention of experimental gastroesophageal reflux, Gastrointest Endosc, 36, pp. 253-256, (1990)
  • [7] Gadacz T.R., Talamini M.A., Lillemoe K.D., Yeo C.J., Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Surg Clin North Am, 70, pp. 1249-1262, (1990)
  • [8] Gear M.W.L., Gillison E.W., Dowling B.L., Randomized prospective trial of the Angelchik antireflux prosthesis, Br J Surg, 71, pp. 681-688, (1984)
  • [9] Gourley G.R., Pellett J.R., Li B.U.K., Adkins W.N., A prospective randomized double-blind study of gastroesophageal reflux in pediatric-sized developmentally disabled patients: Nissen fundoplication versus Angelchik prosthesis, J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 5, pp. 52-61, (1986)
  • [10] Hill L.D., An effective operation for hiatal hernia: an eight year appraisal, Ann Surg, 166, pp. 681-692, (1966)