RESOURCE SCARCITY, ENERGY USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT - A CASE-STUDY OF THE NEW BEDFORD, MASSACHUSETTS, USA, FISHERIES

被引:19
作者
MITCHELL, C [1 ]
CLEVELAND, CJ [1 ]
机构
[1] BOSTON UNIV,CTR ENERGY & ENVIRONM STUDIES,675 COMMONWEALTH AVE,BOSTON,MA 02215
关键词
FISHERIES MANAGEMENT; RESOURCE SCARCITY; ENERGY ANALYSIS; ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1007/BF02394673
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The commercial fishing fleet in New Bedford, Massachusetts, USA, harvests seafood on George's Bank, home of one of the nation's most productive fisheries. We calculated the energy return on investment (EROI) and carbon intensity of protein harvest in the New Bedford fisheries from 1968 to 1988. EROI is the ratio of the energy content of the edible fish protein harvested to the quantity of fossil fuel energy used directly in the harvesting process. Carbon intensity is the quantity of carbon dioxide (CO2) released (from the burning of fossil fuels) per calorie of edible fish protein harvested. The results show that the EROI of protein harvest declined from 0.18 to 0.028 from 1968 to 1988, indicating that the energy used to harvest seafood increased from about 6 to 36 kcal of fuel for each kilocalorie of protein harvested. The quantity of CO2 released per calorie of edible fish protein is a linear function of energy use and therefore increased in a similar manner. During this period there was a large increase in fishing effort (caused by the increase in the real price of seafood products, favorable tax treatment for new vessel construction, and low interest loans from the government), and a decline in several important species of fish. The results suggest that fishing pressure could be managed effectively by the regulation of fuel use by the fleet. Despite the increase in the price of many seafood products, fishermen absorbed many of the costs of increasing scarcity in the form of longer working hours and fewer men per vessel.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 317
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Barnett H. J., 1963, SCARCITY GROWTH
[2]  
BAUMOL WJ, PRIDUCTIVITY AM LEAD
[3]   A SYSTEMS PERSPECTIVE ON THE INTERRELATIONS BETWEEN NATURAL, HUMAN-MADE AND CULTURAL CAPITAL [J].
BERKES, F ;
FOLKE, C .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1992, 5 (01) :1-8
[4]  
BROWN S, 1981, MANAGEMENT STATUS US
[5]  
Chapman P.F., 1983, METAL RESOURCES ENER, DOI 10.1016/C2013-0-04151-5
[6]  
Clark C.W, 1990, MATH BIOECONOMICS
[7]   ENERGY AND THE UNITED-STATES-ECONOMY - A BIOPHYSICAL PERSPECTIVE [J].
CLEVELAND, CJ ;
COSTANZA, R ;
HALL, CAS ;
KAUFMANN, R .
SCIENCE, 1984, 225 (4665) :890-897
[8]  
CLEVELAND CJ, 1991, ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS : THE SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT OF SUSTAINABILITY, P289
[9]  
CLEVELAND CJ, 1993, IN PRESS ECOLOGICAL
[10]   EMBODIED ENERGY AND ECONOMIC VALUATION [J].
COSTANZA, R .
SCIENCE, 1980, 210 (4475) :1219-1224