LABORATORY ASSESSMENT OF GLUCOSE METERS DOES NOT PREDICT RELIABILITY OF CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE

被引:9
作者
BERNBAUM, M
ALBERT, SG
MCGINNIS, J
BRUSCA, S
MILLER, D
HOFFMANN, J
KAISER, FE
MOORADIAN, AD
机构
[1] Division of Endocrinology, St Louis Univ. School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63104
关键词
D O I
10.1093/labmed/25.1.32
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The authors evaluated five glucose meters for accuracy, precision, clinical reliability, and patient perceived ease of use. Three meters produced values within the acceptable range for accuracy and precision. The clinical reliability of the meters was determined by patient trials. Twenty-Jive subjects performed self-monitoring of blood glucose. Only two meters-the One Touch II and AccuChek III -demonstrated clinical reliability in the acceptable range (within 15% of laboratory values). The Companion-2, the meter rated easiest to use, demonstrated acceptable clinical reliability less than 50% of the time. Laboratory assessments of glucose meters should be supplemented by practical patient trials.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 34
页数:3
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据