THE GENERAL FACTOR IN AESTHETIC JUDGEMENTS

[1] Bell C., 1914, ART

[2] BURT C, 1933, PSYCHOL ART

[3] DEWAR H, 1937, THESIS U LONDON

[4] A COMPARISON OF TESTS OF ARTISTIC APPRECIATION [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1938, 8 : 29 - 48

[5] PRIMARY MENTAL ABILITIES. (PSYCHOMETRIC MONOGRAPHS No. 1.) [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1939, 9 : 270 - 275

[6] The validity of judgments as a function of the number of judges [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1939, 25 (06): : 650 - 654

[7] Fry Roger, 1920, VISION DESIGN

[8] GARRETT HE, 1933, STAT PSYCHOL ED

[9] HARTOG PJ, 1936, MARKS EXAMINERS

[10] KANT I, 1914, CRITIK URTHEILSKRAFT

[1] Bell C., 1914, ART

[2] BURT C, 1933, PSYCHOL ART

[3] DEWAR H, 1937, THESIS U LONDON

[4] A COMPARISON OF TESTS OF ARTISTIC APPRECIATION [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1938, 8 : 29 - 48

[5] PRIMARY MENTAL ABILITIES. (PSYCHOMETRIC MONOGRAPHS No. 1.) [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1939, 9 : 270 - 275

[6] The validity of judgments as a function of the number of judges [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1939, 25 (06): : 650 - 654

[7] Fry Roger, 1920, VISION DESIGN

[8] GARRETT HE, 1933, STAT PSYCHOL ED

[9] HARTOG PJ, 1936, MARKS EXAMINERS

[10] KANT I, 1914, CRITIK URTHEILSKRAFT