INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES - PRESENT STATUS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS

[1] BING J, 1950, Acta Chir Scand, V100, P293

[2] BUCHMAN MI, 1970, FERTIL STERIL, V21, P348

[3] BUCK NC, 1964, 5 P INT C AN REPR TR

[4] Buckle A E, 1966, J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw, V73, P993

[5] CARLETON HM, 1933, J OBSTET GYN BR COMM, V40, P81

[6] BIOLOGIC EFFECTS OF INTRAUTERINE DEVICES [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1968, 100 (03) : 448 - &

[7] CORFMAN PA, 1968, ADVANCES PLANNED PAR, V3

[8] CRAIG JM, 1967, FERTIL STERIL, V20, P424

[9] DAVIS HJ, 1970, OBSTET GYNECOL, V36, P350

[10] Davis Hugh J., 1971, INTRAUTERINE DEVICES

[1] BING J, 1950, Acta Chir Scand, V100, P293

[2] BUCHMAN MI, 1970, FERTIL STERIL, V21, P348

[3] BUCK NC, 1964, 5 P INT C AN REPR TR

[4] Buckle A E, 1966, J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw, V73, P993

[5] CARLETON HM, 1933, J OBSTET GYN BR COMM, V40, P81

[6] BIOLOGIC EFFECTS OF INTRAUTERINE DEVICES [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1968, 100 (03) : 448 - &

[7] CORFMAN PA, 1968, ADVANCES PLANNED PAR, V3

[8] CRAIG JM, 1967, FERTIL STERIL, V20, P424

[9] DAVIS HJ, 1970, OBSTET GYNECOL, V36, P350

[10] Davis Hugh J., 1971, INTRAUTERINE DEVICES