LEAF EXPANSION, PHOTOSYNTHESIS, AND WATER RELATIONS OF SUNFLOWER PLANTS GROWN ON COMPACTED SOIL

被引:58
作者
ANDRADE, A
WOLFE, DW
FERERES, E
机构
[1] CORNELL UNIV, DEPT FRUIT & VEGETABLE SCI, ITHACA, NY 14853 USA
[2] UNIV CORDOBA, DEPT AGRON, CORDOBA, SPAIN
关键词
COMPACTION; HELIANTHUS-ANNUUS L; LEAF EXPANSION; NITROGEN; OSMOTIC POTENTIAL; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; ROOT GROWTH; SOIL STRENGTH; TURGOR; WATER POTENTIAL;
D O I
10.1007/BF00016607
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Leaf expansion and growth response of sunflower (Helianthus annuus, L.) to soil compaction were investigated in relation to compaction effects on water relations, nitrogen nutrition, and photosynthesis. A series of field experiments were conducted with plants grown in 20 cm-diameter cylinders with soil bulk densities ranging from 1.2 to 1.7 g cm-3 at the 0-20 cm depth (equivalent to 0.8 to 2.4 MPa soil strength measured with a soil penetrometer). Relative leaf expansion rate (RLER) decreased linearly with increasing soil strength. Smaller plant size in compacted treatments was due not only to slower expansion rates, but also smaller maximum size of individual leaves. Sensitivity of leaf expansion to soil strength was best illustrated by a reduction in RLER and maximum size of the first leaf to emerge in a treatment with only the lower 10-20 cm of the profile compacted (bulk density of 1.7 g cm-3). Root growth was less affected than shoot growth by compaction and root:shoot ratios of compacted treatments were significantly higher than the control. Soil compaction had no significant effect on pre-dawn or midday leaf water potential, osmotic potential or leaf turgor. Specific leaf weight was usually higher in plants grown on compacted soil, and leaf nitrogen and photosynthesis per unit leaf area were either unaffected by treatment or significantly higher in compacted treatments. The results suggest that early growth reduction of sunflower plants grown on compacted soil was more sink- than source-limited with regard to water, nitrogen, and carbon supply. Further evaluation of this hypothesis will require verification that these whole-leaf measurements provided a sufficiently accurate approximation of treatment effects on the dynamic equilibria of expanding cells.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 184
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
AGUERA VJ, 1991, C INT MECANIZACION A, V22, P201
[2]   PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSES OF LUPIN ROOTS TO SOIL COMPACTION [J].
ATWELL, BJ .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1988, 111 (02) :277-281
[3]   COMPACTION OF A SWELLING CLAY SOIL BY AGRICULTURAL TRAFFIC - EFFECTS UPON CONDITIONS FOR GROWTH OF WINTER CEREALS AND EVIDENCE FOR SOME RECOVERY OF STRUCTURE [J].
BLACKWELL, PS ;
WARD, MA ;
LEFEVRE, RN ;
COWAN, DJ .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1985, 36 (04) :633-650
[4]  
BREMNER JM, 1965, METHODS PLANT ANAL 2
[5]   THE RELATIVE SENSITIVITY OF SPRING BARLEY, SPRING FIELD BEANS AND SUGAR-BEET CROPS TO SOIL COMPACTION [J].
BRERETON, JC ;
MCGOWAN, M ;
DAWKINS, TCK .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1986, 13 (03) :223-237
[6]  
CARMI A, 1983, PHOTOSYNTHETICA, V17, P240
[7]   WATER DEFICIT AND ABSCISIC-ACID CAUSE DIFFERENTIAL INHIBITION OF SHOOT VERSUS ROOT-GROWTH IN SOYBEAN SEEDLINGS - ANALYSIS OF GROWTH, SUGAR ACCUMULATION, AND GENE-EXPRESSION [J].
CREELMAN, RA ;
MASON, HS ;
BENSEN, RJ ;
BOYER, JS ;
MULLET, JE .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 92 (01) :205-214
[8]   RESPONSE BY WHEAT, RAPE, AND FIELD PEAS TO PRESOWING HERBICIDES AND DEEP TILLAGE [J].
DANN, PR ;
THOMAS, AG ;
CUNNINGHAM, RB ;
MOORE, PHR .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1987, 27 (03) :431-437
[9]  
GOSS MJ, 1980, J EXP BOT, V31, P577, DOI 10.1093/jxb/31.2.577
[10]   SENSITIVITY OF 8 CEREAL AND LEGUME SPECIES TO THE COMPACTION STATUS OF DEEP, SANDY SOILS [J].
HENDERSON, CWL .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1991, 31 (03) :347-355