ADDITION OF DROPERIDOL TO PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA - EFFECT ON NAUSEA AND VOMITING

被引:47
作者
WILLIAMS, OA [1 ]
CLARKE, FL [1 ]
HARRIS, RW [1 ]
SMITH, P [1 ]
PEACOCK, JE [1 ]
机构
[1] BASSETLAW HOSP & COMMUNITY SERV,NHS TRUST,WORKSOP S81 0BD,NOTTS,ENGLAND
关键词
POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; NAUSEA; VOMITING; ANTIEMETICS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2044.1993.tb07419.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
A double‐blind trial of the effect of droperidol on the incidence of nausea and vomiting in patients using patient‐controlled analgesia was carried out in 60 healthy women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. After a standard anaesthetic including droperidol 2.5 mg as a prophylactic antiemetic, patients were randomly allocated to receive postoperative patient‐controlled analgesia with either morphine alone (2mg.ml−1) or morphine (2mg.ml−1) with droperidol (0.2 mg.ml−1) added to the syringe. Verbal scores and visual analogue scores for nausea, vomiting, pain and sedation were made at 4, 12 and 24 h postoperatively, and any requirement for intramuscular prochlorperazine noted. There was no difference between the groups at any time in the amount of morphine consumed or in pain scores. At 12 h, patients receiving droperidol experienced significantly less nausea, and over the first 24 h, 31% required prochlorperazine compared with 59.3% of patients not receiving droperidol. The number of patients with sedation at 24 h was significantly greater in the droperidol group. We conclude that the addition of droperidol to morphine both reduces nausea and the need for further antiemetic treatment. Copyright © 1993, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 884
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Lancet, V1, P651
[2]   THE INCIDENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING IN WOMEN UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPY IS INFLUENCED BY THE DAY OF MENSTRUAL-CYCLE [J].
BEATTIE, WS ;
LINDBLAD, T ;
BUCKLEY, DN ;
FORREST, JB .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1991, 38 (03) :298-302
[3]   POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING .4. FACTORS RELATED TO POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING [J].
BELLVILLE, JW ;
BROSS, IDJ ;
HOWLAND, WS .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1960, 21 (02) :186-193
[4]  
Jorgensen N H, 1990, J Clin Anesth, V2, P312, DOI 10.1016/0952-8180(90)90076-F
[5]  
KAPUR PA, 1991, ANESTH ANALG, V73, P243
[6]   AN ACUTE PAIN SERVICE IN AN AUSTRALIAN TEACHING HOSPITAL - THE 1ST YEAR [J].
MACINTYRE, PE ;
RUNCIMAN, WB ;
WEBB, RK .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1990, 153 (07) :417-421
[7]   COMPARISON OF THE USE OF DOMPERIDONE, DROPERIDOL AND METOCLOPRAMIDE IN THE PREVENTION OF NAUSEA AND VOMITING FOLLOWING MAJOR GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY [J].
MADEJ, TH ;
SIMPSON, KH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1986, 58 (08) :884-887
[8]   COMPARISON OF THE USE OF DOMPERIDONE, DROPERIDOL AND METOCLOPRAMIDE IN THE PREVENTION OF NAUSEA AND VOMITING FOLLOWING GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY IN DAY CASES [J].
MADEJ, TH ;
SIMPSON, KH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1986, 58 (08) :879-883
[9]   ANESTHESIA AND EMESIS .1. ETIOLOGY [J].
PALAZZO, MGA ;
STRUNIN, L .
CANADIAN ANAESTHETISTS SOCIETY JOURNAL, 1984, 31 (02) :178-187
[10]  
PURKIS I E, 1964, Can Anaesth Soc J, V11, P335, DOI 10.1007/BF03003420