ORAL ONDANSETRON FOR THE CONTROL OF CISPLATIN-INDUCED DELAYED EMESIS - A LARGE, MULTICENTER, DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE TRIAL OF ONDANSETRON VERSUS PLACEBO

被引:72
作者
NAVARI, RM
MADAJEWICZ, S
ANDERSON, N
TCHEKMEDYIAN, NS
WHALEY, W
GAREWAL, H
BECK, TM
CHANG, AY
GREENBERG, B
CALDWELL, KC
HUFFMAN, DH
GOULD, JR
CARRON, G
OSSI, M
ANDERSON, EM
机构
[1] SUNY STONY BROOK,STONY BROOK,NY 11794
[2] UNIV ROCHESTER,GENESSEE HOSP,CTR CANC,ROCHESTER,NY 14607
[3] CTR CANC,BOSTON,MA
[4] PACIFIC COAST HEMATOL ONCOL MED GRP,LONG BEACH,CA
[5] W PACES FERRY HOSP,ATLANTA,GA
[6] VET AFFAIRS MED CTR,TUCSON,AZ
[7] MT STATES TUMOR INST,BOISE,ID
[8] UNIV CONNECTICUT,CTR HLTH,FARMINGTON,CT
[9] ST PAUL HEMATOL ONCOL,ST PAUL,MN
[10] PIKES PEAK CANC SPECIALISTS,COLORADO SPRINGS,CO
[11] ONCOL ASSOCIATES W KENTUCKY,PADUCAH,KY
[12] GLAXO INC,RES TRIANGLE PK,NC 27709
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1995.13.9.2408
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and safety of oral ondansetron in the control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis in patients who do not require rescue antiemetic therapy for acute emesis. Patients and Methods: Five hundred thirty-eight chemotherapy-naive patients who received cisplatin chemotherapy (greater than or equal to 70 mg/m(2)), and who were not rescued for acute emesis, were eligible to be randomized to receive one of three oral regimens to control delayed emesis, Group I received placebo on days 2 to 6; group II received ondansetron 8 mg twice daily on days 2 and 3 and placebo on days 4 to 6; group III received ondansetron 8 mg twice daily on days 2 to 6, All patients received intravenous ondansetron (0.15 mg/kg every 4 hours for three doses) for the control of acute emesis on day 1. The number of emetic episodes on days 2 cmd 3 combined (days 2/3, when incidence and severity of delayed emesis were expected to be greatest) was considered the primary measure of efficacy, Results: Patients who received odansetron had significantly fewer emetic episodes on days 2/3, 4, and 5 than those who received placebo (P less than or equal to .002 on each day). Additionally, significantly more patients who received ondansetron had a complete plus major response (C + MR; less than or equal to two emetic episodes) than those who received placebo on days 2/3 (56% v 37%, P = .001), 4 (94% v 85%, P = .005), and 5 (98% v 88%, P = .006). patients who received ondansetron had significantly less nausea on day 2/3 when day-1 nausea was used as the baseline score (P = .025). Patients who received ondansetron also had significantly less nausea on day 4 (P = .042) and the results approached significance on day 5 (P = .066). Conclusion: Oral ondansetron had a significant effect in the control of cisplatin-induced delayed emesis and nausea in patients who had not required rescue anti-emetics during the acute emesis period, The control of delayed nausea and vomiting was most notable in the immediate 2 days following cisplatin administration, with the clinical difference narrowing between the two treatment arms on subsequent days. (C) 1995 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:2408 / 2416
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   DELAYED EMESIS - A DILEMMA IN ANTIEMETIC CONTROL [J].
CLARK, RA ;
GRALLA, RJ .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 1993, 1 (04) :182-185
[2]   EFFICACY OF ONDANSETRON (GR-38032F) AND THE ROLE OF SEROTONIN IN CISPLATIN-INDUCED NAUSEA AND VOMITING [J].
CUBEDDU, LX ;
HOFFMANN, IS ;
FUENMAYOR, NT ;
FINN, AL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 322 (12) :810-816
[3]   ASSESSMENT OF NAUSEA [J].
DELFAVERO, A ;
ROILA, F ;
BASURTO, C ;
MINOTTI, V ;
BALLATORI, E ;
PATOIA, L ;
TONATO, M ;
TOGNONI, G .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1990, 38 (02) :115-120
[4]   Ondansetron Compared with High-Dose Metoclopramide in Prophylaxis of Acute and Delayed Cisplatin-Induced Nausea and Vomiting - A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study [J].
Demulder, PHM ;
Seynaeve, C ;
Vermorken, JB ;
Vanliessum, PA ;
Molsjevdevic, S ;
Allman, EL ;
Beranek, P ;
Verweij, J .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 113 (11) :834-840
[5]  
DEMULDER PHM, 1994, 19 P SAT S C EUR SOC, P24
[6]  
GANDARA DR, 1991, EUR J CANCER, V27, pS9
[7]  
GRUNBERG SM, 1990, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V9, P327
[8]  
HACKING A, 1992, European Journal of Cancer, V28A, pS28, DOI 10.1016/0959-8049(92)90633-D
[9]   A SINGLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF INTRAVENOUS ONDANSETRON, A SELECTIVE SEROTONIN ANTAGONIST, WITH INTRAVENOUS METOCLOPRAMIDE IN THE PREVENTION OF NAUSEA AND VOMITING ASSOCIATED WITH HIGH-DOSE CISPLATIN CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
HAINSWORTH, J ;
HARVEY, W ;
PENDERGRASS, K ;
KASIMIS, B ;
OBLON, D ;
MONAGHAN, G ;
GANDARA, D ;
HESKETH, P ;
KHOJASTEH, A ;
HARKER, G ;
YORK, M ;
SIDDIQUI, T ;
FINN, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 9 (05) :721-728
[10]   ORAL GRANISETRON ALONE AND IN COMBINATION WITH DEXAMETHASONE - A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED COMPARISON AGAINST HIGH-DOSE METOCLOPRAMIDE PLUS DEXAMETHASONE IN PREVENTION OF CISPLATIN-INDUCED EMESIS [J].
HERON, JF ;
GOEDHALS, L ;
JORDAAN, JP ;
CUNNINGHAM, J ;
CEDAR, E .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1994, 5 (07) :579-584