RAINFALL INTERCEPTION BY TREES OF PINUS-RADIATA AND EUCALYPTUS-VIMINALIS IN A 1300 MM RAINFALL AREA OF SOUTHEASTERN NEW-SOUTH-WALES .1. GROSS LOSSES AND THEIR VARIABILITY

被引：25

作者：

POOK, EW

MOORE, PHR

HALL, T

机构：

[1] CSIRO Division of Plant Industry, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory

[2] Sarina, Queensland

来源：

HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES | 1991年 / 5卷 / 02期

关键词：

INTERCEPTION LOSS; CANOPY STORAGE; PINUS-RADIATA; EUCALYPTUS-VIMINALIS;

D O I：

10.1002/hyp.3360050202

中图分类号：

TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];

学科分类号：

081501 ;

摘要：

Interception loss, I, was determined by continuous concurrent measurements of the canopy precipitation balances of a mature seed orchard tree of Pinus radiata and a dominant tree of Eucalyptus viminalis at a mountainous high rainfall site (900 m a.s.l.) in Tallaganda State Forest of the Upper Shoalhaven Catchment. Approximate canopy storage capacity (Sc) of the pine was 54 l, and that of the eucalypt was 11.3 l. Gross pine I was 26.5 per cent and eucalypt I was 8.3 per cent of total incident rainfall over a period of 18 months, from June 1975 to December 1976. The exponential model that provided the best fit to overall data relating I to gross rainfall (P(g)) was of good precision for the pine (r2 = 0.73) but rather poor precision for the eucalypt (r2 = 0.27). A consistent pattern in interception data of the two canopy types suggested that variation in I was related to change in pervasive conditions influencing rates of evaporation from wet canopies during rainfall. Multiple regression analyses confirmed that factors such as rainfall intensity and windspeed explained some of the variation in eucalypt I but little in pine I. Negative eucalypt I and corresponding low values of pine I over a wide range of P(g) (up to 20 mm) suggest that capture of wind-borne precipitation (cloud, mist, or fog) had also complicated the canopy precipitation balances.

引用

页码：127 / 141

页数：15

共 24 条

[1]

The Shoalhaven Scheme, (1968)

[2]

Aston A.R., Rainfall interception by eight small trees, J. Hydrol., 42, pp. 383-396, (1979)

[3]

Aston A.R., Dunin F.X., Land‐use hydrology: Shoalhaven, New South Wales, J. Hydrol., 48, pp. 71-87, (1980)

[4]

Bell F.C., Gatenby M.T., (1969)

[5]

Brown A.G., Experience in management of a radiata pine seed orchard at Tallaganda State Forest, New South Wales, Aust. For. Res., 5, pp. 15-30, (1971)

[6]

Costin A.B., Greenaway M.A., Wright L.G., Harvesting Water From Land, A. N. U. Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, (1984)

[7]

Crockford R.H., Johnson M.E., Some errors in the measurement of precipitation, throughfall and stemflow and the implications for estimation of interception, Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, (1983)

[8]

Crockford R.H., Richardson D.P., Partitioning of rainfall in a eucalypt forest and a pine plantation in south‐eastern Australia. I. Throughfall measurement in a eucalypt forest: Effect of method and species composition, Hydrological Processes, 4, pp. 131-144, (1990)

[9]

Crockford R.H., Richardson D.P., Partitioning of rainfall in a eucalypt forest and a pine plantation in south‐eastern Australia. II. Stemflow and factors affecting stemflow in a dry sclerophyll eucalypt forest and a Pinus radiata plantation, Hydrological Processes, 4, pp. 145-155, (1990)

[10]

Crockford R.H., Richardson D.P., Partitioning of rainfall in a eucalypt forest and a pine plantation in south‐eastern Australia. IV. The relationship of canopy storage capacity to the measured interception storage of a dry sclerophyll forest, Hydrological Processes, 4, pp. 169-188, (1990)

← 1 2 3 →