EFFECT OF AGE AND ASTIGMATISM ON THE AMO ARRAY MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR-LENS

被引:35
作者
JACOBI, PC
KONEN, W
机构
关键词
AGE; ASTIGMATISM; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEGRADATION OF IMAGE; GLARE; MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS; PSEUDOACCOMMODATION;
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80217-9
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs) have been designed to provide better uncorrected near visual acuity than monofocal IOLs, However, the increase in depth of focus is combined with a significant decrease in contrast sensitivity and glare. We implanted a new zonal-progressive MIOL (AMO Array) in 31 eyes of 25 patients whose mean age was 60.8 +/- 13.5 years. At 12.1 +/- 2.4 months postoperatively, the uncorrected visual acuity averaged 0.56 +/- 0.09 (20/32) for distance and 0.54 +/- 0.12 (20/40) for near focus, Seventy-five percent of patients achieved a best corrected distance visual acuity of greater than or equal to 0.9 (20/22). With distance correction only, mean near visual acuity was 0.72 +/- 0.17 (20/25). Best corrected near acuity reached 0.89 +/- 0.11 (20/22), requiring an additional near add of +1.0 to +2.0 diopters (D). We observed an age-dependent difference in the depth of focus. In younger patients (46 +/- 6 years), the pseudoaccommodation range was 6.25 D; acuity attained was greater than or equal to 0.4 (20/50). In older patients (71 +/- 7 years), visual acuity at the near focus was substantially reduced (two lines). Regan contrast sensitivity was lower for MIOL patients at all contrast levels, but the difference was statistically significant only at very low contrast (11%), Contrast sensitivity and glare were dependent on the patient's age but did not change with the amount of postoperative astigmatism, Younger patients were very satisfied with the results of MIOL implantation, and the small loss of contrast sensitivity was counterbalanced by the advantage of improved depth of focus and uncorrected near visual acuity.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 561
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Huber C, Planned myopic astigmatism as a substitute for accommodation in pseudophakia, Am Intra-Ocular Implant Soc J, 7, pp. 244-249, (1981)
[2]  
Datiles MB, Gancayco T, Low myopia with low astigmatic correction gives cataract surgery patients good depth of focus, Ophthalmology, 97, pp. 922-926, (1990)
[3]  
Boerner CF, Thrasher BH, Results of monovision correction in bilateral pseudophakes, Am Intra-Ocular Implant Soc J, 10, pp. 49-50, (1984)
[4]  
Nakazawa M, Ohtsuki K, Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses, Am J Ophthalmol, 96, pp. 435-438, (1983)
[5]  
Holladay JT, Van Dijk H, Lang A, Et al., Optical performance of multifocal intraocular lenses, J Cataract Refract Surg, 16, pp. 413-422, (1990)
[6]  
Percival SPB, Prospective study of the new diffractive bifocal intraocular lens, Eye, 3, pp. 571-585, (1989)
[7]  
Gimbel HV, Sanders DR, Raanan MG, Visual and refractive results of multifocal intraocular lenses, Ophthalmology, 98, pp. 881-888, (1991)
[8]  
Olsen T, Corydon L, Contrast sensitivity as a function of focus in patients with the diffractive multifocal intraocular lens, J Cataract Refract Surg, 16, pp. 703-706, (1990)
[9]  
Ellingson FT, Explantation of 3M diffractive intraocular lenses, J Cataract Refract Surg, 16, pp. 697-702, (1990)
[10]  
Percival P, Indications for the multizone bifocal implant, J Cataract Refract Surg, 16, pp. 193-197, (1990)