SYNOVIAL SARCOMA - INTERRELATIONSHIP OF THE BIPHASIC AND MONOPHASIC SUBTYPES

In order to assess minimum diagnostic criteria for synovial sarcoma, particularly the monophasic variety, and the inter-relationship between the monophasic and biphasic types, 32 examples were studied histologically, immunohistochemically (26 cases), and ultrastructurally (13 cases). Of the six biphasic synovial sarcomas examined by electron microscopy, the spindle cell component did not show evidence of epithelial differentiation or resemble the epithelial phase, but did appear fibroblastic; no tumor cells transitional between the spindle and epithelial component were evident. In contrast, all of the seven monophasic lesions had ultrastructural growth patterns and some cellular features approximating the epithelial cells of the biphasic variant. In 11 biphasic synovial sarcomas, epithelial membrane antigen was detected in the glandular epithelium of all cases and cytokeratins in eight cases; in no case were these antigens detected in the spindle cell regions of biphasic lesions. Of the 15 monophasic synovial sarcomas, two were positive for cytokeratins and four for epithelial membrane antigen. Thus, the detection of epithelial markers either immunohistochemically or by electron microscopy (or both) should be the minimal diagnostic criteria for monophasic synovial sarcomas. Based on these findings, it is suggested that monophasic synovial sarcomas do not represent the spindle cell or "stromal" phase of biphasic synovial sarcomas, but are a poorly differentiated variant of the latter. As others have suggested, these tumors are, in fact, carcinosarcomas and carcinomas of the soft tissues and the designation synovial sarcoma is inappropriate for this tumor class.