METAANALYSIS OF THE RELATIVE NEPHROTOXICITY OF HIGH-OSMOLALITY AND LOW-OSMOLALITY IODINATED CONTRAST-MEDIA

被引:504
作者
BARRETT, BJ [1 ]
CARLISLE, EJ [1 ]
机构
[1] MCMASTER UNIV, ST JOSEPHS HOSP, DIV NEPHROL, HAMILTON L8S 4L8, ONTARIO, CANADA
关键词
CONTRAST MEDIA; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; COMPLICATIONS; EFFECTS; TOXICITY; KIDNEY; FAILURE; UROGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.188.1.8511292
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To determine whether low-osmolality contrast media (LOCM) are less nephrotoxic than high-osmolality contrast media (HOCM), the authors searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and other sources to find randomized trials with data collected on changes in glomerular filtration rate or serum creatinine (SCr) level with LOCM and HOCM. Forty-five trials were found. Data were unavailable from 14 trials. When the P values from the other 31 trials were pooled, an overall P value of .02 was found. Among 24 trials with available data, the mean change in SCr was 0.2-6.2 mumol/L less with LOCM than HOCM. Among 25 trials with available data, the pooled odds of a rise in SCr level of more than 44 mumol/L with LOCM was 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.77) times that after HOCM. For patients with existing renal failure, this odds ratio was 0.5 (CI, 0.36-0.68), while it was 0.75 (CI, 0.52-1.1) in patients without prior renal failure. Greater changes in SCr level occurred only in those with existing renal failure and were less common with LOCM (odds ratio, 0.44; Cl, 0.26-0.73). Use of LOCM may be beneficial in patients with existing renal failure.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 178
页数:8
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   NEPHROTOXICITY OF IONIC AND NON-IONIC CONTRAST-MEDIA IN AORTO-FEMORAL ANGIOGRAPHY [J].
ALBRECHTSSON, U ;
HULTBERG, B ;
LARUSDOTTIR, H ;
NORGREN, L .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA-DIAGNOSIS, 1985, 26 (05) :615-618
[2]   A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-STUDY OF THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY AND EFFICACY OF HEXABRIX IN PEDIATRIC ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY [J].
ANTHONY, CL ;
TONKIN, ILD ;
MARINGARCIA, J ;
PAUL, RN ;
BELL, ED ;
BROOKS, E ;
EASTHAM, ED ;
FOWLER, SL .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1984, 19 (06) :S335-S343
[3]  
BANI E, 1985, INT J PED NEPHROL, V6, P271
[4]   NONIONIC LOW-OSMOLALITY VERSUS IONIC HIGH-OSMOLALITY CONTRAST MATERIAL FOR INTRAVENOUS USE IN PATIENTS PERCEIVED TO BE AT HIGH-RISK - RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
BARRETT, BJ ;
PARFREY, PS ;
MCDONALD, JR ;
HEFFERTON, DM ;
REDDY, ER ;
MCMANAMON, PJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 183 (01) :105-110
[5]   CONTRAST NEPHROPATHY IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED RENAL-FUNCTION - HIGH VERSUS LOW OSMOLAR MEDIA [J].
BARRETT, BJ ;
PARFREY, PS ;
VAVASOUR, HM ;
MCDONALD, J ;
KENT, G ;
HEFFERTON, D ;
ODEA, F ;
STONE, E ;
REDDY, R ;
MCMANAMON, PJ .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 41 (05) :1274-1279
[6]   A COMPARISON OF NONIONIC, LOW-OSMOLALITY RADIOCONTRAST AGENTS WITH IONIC, HIGH-OSMOLALITY AGENTS DURING CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION [J].
BARRETT, BJ ;
PARFREY, PS ;
VAVASOUR, HM ;
ODEA, F ;
KENT, G ;
STONE, E .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 326 (07) :431-436
[7]  
BARRETT BJ, 1991, ACUTE RENAL FAILURE, P481
[8]  
BERLAND LL, 1984, INVEST RADIOL S6, V21, pS376
[9]   NEPHROTOXICITY OF CONTRAST-MEDIA [J].
BERNS, AS ;
KANTER, A ;
COHEN, JJ ;
GARELLA, S ;
SIMON, N ;
DUFFY, B ;
SPRAGUE, S ;
LAU, K .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1989, 36 (04) :730-740
[10]   COMPARISON OF AN IONIC WITH A NONIONIC CONTRAST AGENT FOR CARDIAC ANGIOGRAPHY - RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER TRIAL [J].
BETTMANN, MA ;
HIGGINS, CB .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1985, 20 (01) :S70-S74