EFFECTS OF METHYLPHENIDATE ON RESPONSE RATE AND MEASURES OF MOTOR-PERFORMANCE AND REINFORCEMENT EFFICACY

被引:20
作者
HEYMAN, GM
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, William James Hall, Harvard University, Cambridge, 02138, MA
关键词
METHYLPHENIDATE; RESPONSE RATE; REINFORCEMENT EFFICACY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MATCHING LAW; RESPONSE STRENGTH EQUATION; RATE DEPENDENCY PRINCIPLE; CLINICAL EFFECTS; VARIABLE-INTERVAL SCHEDULE; LEVER PRESS; RAT;
D O I
10.1007/BF02245492
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This experiment evaluated the effects of methylphenidate on reinforced responding in rats. In each session the subjects (rats) earned reinforcement on seven different variable-interval reinforcement schedules. The average intervals varied from 108 to 3 s and provided reinforcement rates ranging from about 30 to 1100/h. Response rate was a negatively accelerated function of reinforcement rate. Low doses of methylphenidate (1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg) increased responding maintained by the four leanest schedules, but had little effect on responding maintained by the three densest schedules. In contrast, an 8.0 mg/kg dose increased responding maintained by the three densest schedules and slightly decreased responding maintained by leaner schedules. A quantitative model of reinforced responding, referred to as the matching law or response strength equation, was fitted to the data.This equation has two parameters. On the basis of previous experiments, one was used to measure changes in reinforcement efficacy and the other was used to measure changes in motor performance. The 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg doses changed the reinforcement parameter in the same way as did increases in deprivation and reward magnitude. The 8.0 mg/kg dose changed the motor parameter in the same was as did decreases in lever weight. It was concluded that methylphenidate increases reinforcement efficacy, and that the highest dose changed the topography of responding. The results are discussed in terms of the response strength equation, the rate dependency principle, and the question of how to interpret changes in reinforcement efficacy and motor performance.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 152
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
BRADSHAW CM, 1983, BEHAV ANAL LETT, V3, P93
[2]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RESPONSE RATE AND REINFORCEMENT FREQUENCY IN VARIABLE-INTERVAL SCHEDULES .2. EFFECT OF THE VOLUME OF SUCROSE REINFORCEMENT [J].
BRADSHAW, CM ;
RUDDLE, HV ;
SZABADI, E .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1981, 35 (03) :263-269
[3]  
BRADSHAW CM, 1977, J PSYCHOL, V68, P437
[4]  
DEVILLIERS PA, 1976, PSYCHOL BULL, V83, P1131, DOI DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.83.6.1131
[5]  
Dews PB, 1977, ADV BEHAV PHARMACOL, V1, P167
[6]   A PROGRESSION FOR GENERATING VARIABLE-INTERVAL SCHEDULES [J].
FLESHLER, M ;
HOFFMAN, HS .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1962, 5 (04) :529-&
[7]  
FRANZ DN, 1980, GOODMAN GILMANS PHAR, P585
[8]  
Gittelman-Klein R, 1987, PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY 3, P1215
[9]   REWARD, PERFORMANCE, AND THE RESPONSE STRENGTH METHOD IN SELF-STIMULATING RATS - VALIDATION AND NEUROLEPTICS [J].
HAMILTON, AL ;
STELLAR, JR ;
HART, EB .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1985, 35 (06) :897-904
[10]   FORMAL PROPERTIES OF MATCHING LAW [J].
HERRNSTE.RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1974, 21 (01) :159-164