A COMPARISON OF RESULTS OF METAANALYSES OF RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF CLINICAL EXPERTS - TREATMENTS FOR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION

被引:1037
作者
ANTMAN, EM
LAU, J
KUPELNICK, B
MOSTELLER, F
CHALMERS, TC
机构
[1] HARVARD UNIV, SCH PUBL HLTH, DEPT HLTH POLICY & MANAGEMENT, TECHNOL ASSESSMENT GRP, BOSTON, MA 02115 USA
[2] BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSP, DEPT MED, DIV CARDIOVASC, BOSTON, MA 02115 USA
[3] NEW ENGLAND MED CTR HOSP, CTR CARDIOVASC HLTH SERV RES, BOSTON, MA 02111 USA
[4] HARVARD UNIV, SCH MED, BOSTON, MA 02115 USA
[5] DEPT VET AFFAIRS MED CTR, BOSTON, MA USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1992年 / 268卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.268.2.240
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective.-To examine the temporal relationship between accumulating data from randomized control trials of treatments for myocardial infarction and the recommendations of clinical experts writing review articles and textbook chapters. Data Sources.-(1) MEDLINE search from 1966 to present; search terms used were myocardial infarction, clinical trials, multicenter studies, double-blind method, meta-analysis, and the text word "random:"; (2) references from pertinent articles and books; and (3) all editions of English-language general medical texts and manuals and review articles on treatment of myocardial infarction. Study Selection.-Randomized control trials of therapies for reducing the risk of total mortality in myocardial infarction (acute and secondary prevention). Review articles and textbook chapters dealing with the general clinical management of patients with myocardial infarction. Data Extraction.-Two authors read the material and recorded the results; disagreements were resolved by conference. Data Synthesis.-We used the technique of cumulative meta-analysis (performing a new meta-analysis when the results of a new clinical trial are published) and compared the results with the recommendations of the experts for various treatments for myocardial infarction. Discrepancies were detected between the meta-analytic patterns of effectiveness in the randomized trials and the recommendations of reviewers. Review articles often failed to mention important advances or exhibited delays in recommending effective preventive measures. In some cases, treatments that have no effect on mortality or are potentially harmful continued to be recommended by several clinical experts. Conclusions.-Finding and analyzing all therapeutic trials in a given field has become such a difficult and specialized task that the clinical experts called on to summarize the evidence in a timely fashion need access to better databases and new statistical techniques to assist them in this important task.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 248
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, NEW ENGL J MED, V321, P406
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1980, LANCET, V1, P1172
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, LANCET, V2, P349
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1986, LANCET, V1, P397
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1988, BRIT MED J, V296, P320
[6]  
BABER NS, 1983, CIRCULATION, V67, P71
[7]   CONFIDENCE IN RESULTS OF BETA-BLOCKER POST-INFARCTION TRIALS [J].
BABER, NS ;
LEWIS, JA .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1982, 284 (6331) :1749-1750
[8]   AN OVERVIEW OF 6 CLINICAL-TRIALS OF ASPIRIN IN CORONARY HEART-DISEASE [J].
CANNER, PL .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1987, 6 (03) :255-&
[9]  
CANNER PL, 1983, ISRAEL J MED SCI, V19, P413
[10]  
CHALMERS I, 1991, BRIT MED J, P127