METHODOLOGY REVIEW - STATISTICAL APPROACHES FOR ASSESSING MEASUREMENT BIAS

被引:322
作者
MILLSAP, RE
EVERSON, HT
机构
[1] Baruch College, City University of New York
关键词
BIAS DETECTION; DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING; ITEM BIAS; MEASUREMENT BIAS; TEST BIAS;
D O I
10.1177/014662169301700401
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Statistical methods developed over the last decade for detecting measurement bias in psychological and educational tests are reviewed. Earlier methods for assessing measurement bias generally have been replaced by more sophisticated statistical techniques, such as the Mantel-Haenszel procedure, the standardization approach, logistic regression models, and item response theory approaches. The review employs a conceptual framework that distinguishes methods of detecting measurement bias based on either observed or unobserved conditional invariance models. Although progress has been made in the development of statistical methods for detecting measurement bias, issues related to the choice of matching variable, the nonuniform nature of measurement bias, the suitability of current approaches for new and emerging performance assessment methods, and insights into the causes of measurement bias remain elusive. Clearly, psychometric solutions to the problems of measurement bias will further understanding of the more central issue of construct validity. The continuing development of statistical methods for detecting and understanding the causes of measurement bias will continue to be an important scientific challenge.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 334
页数:38
相关论文
共 159 条
[2]  
Agresti A., 1990, CATEGORICAL DATA ANA
[3]  
ALDERMAN DL, 1981, ETS8116 ED TEST SERV
[4]  
Amemiya T, 1986, ADV ECONOMETRICS
[5]   RATING FORMULATION FOR ORDERED RESPONSE CATEGORIES [J].
ANDRICH, D .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1978, 43 (04) :561-573
[6]   ITEM-RACE INTERACTION ON A TEST OF SCHOLASTIC APTITUDE [J].
ANGOFF, WH ;
FORD, SF .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1973, 10 (02) :95-106
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1980, ANAL CROSS CLASSIFIE
[8]   A COMPARISON OF 2 PROCEDURES FOR COMPUTING IRT EQUATING COEFFICIENTS [J].
BAKER, FB ;
ALKARNI, A .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1991, 28 (02) :147-162
[10]  
Berk R. A., 1982, HDB METHODS DETECTIN