EFFICACY OF LISTERINE, MERIDOL AND CHLORHEXIDINE MOUTHRINSES AS SUPPLEMENTS TO REGULAR TOOTH-CLEANING MEASURES

The anti-plaque, anti-gingivitis and anti-microbial efficacies of a phenolic compound (Listerine(R)) and 2 different amine/stannous fluoride mouthwashes (Meridol(R) I, II) were compared when these solutions were used in addition to usual toothcleaning. A placebo preparation was utilized as a negative control and a chlorhexidine solution as a positive control in this double-blind study. After professional toothcleaning, 49 volunteers continued their habitual, self-performed and non-supervised oral hygiene for a period of 2 weeks, in order to have a more standard baseline. At day 0, they began to rinse twice daily with 1 of the 5 mouthwashes. After 3 weeks of rinsing, plaque indices remained the lowest in the chlorhexidine and the Meridol(R) I groups, while subjects using Listerine(R) or Meridol(R) II demonstrated similar indices significantly lower than that of individuals rinsing with the placebo solution. Through this period, the gingival index scores were similar in the Meridol(R), Listerine(R) and chlorhexidine groups. At day 21, the mean GI scores in the chlorhexidine group were significantly lower than the scores in the placebo group. The plaque vitality scores showed a bacterial effect in vivo of chlorhexidine and, to a lesser extent, of the Meridol(R) solutions. No substantial evidence of an antibacterial effect in vivo was found for Listerine(R). This study has demonstrated that when mouthrinses are used to supplement habitual mechanical oral hygiene, chlorhexidine remains the most powerful solution. Furthermore, it was also shown that a combination of habitual self-performed and non-supervised oral hygiene with Meridol(R) or Listerine(R) is more beneficial for plaque control than the use of mechanical oral hygiene alone.