COMPARISON OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING AND ENDOSCOPY IN DISTINGUISHING THE TYPE AND SEVERITY OF INFLAMMATORY BOWEL-DISEASE

Twenty consecutive patients with first-time presentation of suspected inflammatory bowel disease underwent both endoscopy with biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within a 3-day period; the relative abilities of endoscopy and MRT to distinguish ulcerative colitis (UC) from Crohn's disease (CD) and to determine the severity of the disease process were compared. In 18 of 20 patients, a diagnosis of UC or CD could be made on histological specimens. MRT correctly diagnosed 17 of these 18 patients using T1-weighted fat-suppressed spin echo and gadolinium enhancement. Endoscopy correctly diagnosed 15 patients. Overall, MRI was not significantly better (p > 0.05) than endoscopy in distinguishing UC from CD. MRI correctly graded the severity of inflammatory changes in 13 of 20 patients, and endoscopy did so in 11 of 20. MRT and endoscopy findings were within one grade of histology findings in seven patients each. No significant difference (p > 0.05) was found between MRI and endoscopy in the ability to estimate the severity of the disease (as determined from biopsies). Bowel wall thickness measured on MR images demonstrated good correlation with percentage of contrast enhancement: r 0.61; p = 0.003. Tn sum, magnetic resonance imaging was shown to be comparable with endoscopy in differentiating UC from CD and in gauging the severity of disease. Transmural assessment, sagittal imaging, and the lack of invasiveness were attractive features of MRI.