SUSTAINABLE INSPIRATORY PRESSURES OVER VARYING FLOWS, VOLUMES, AND DUTY CYCLES

This study identifies the influence of flow (0.5-2.0 l/s), duty cycle (0.29-0.57), and tidal volume (1.08-2.16 liters) on sustainable inspiratory muscle pressure (Pmus) and transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) development. Six normal humans performed endurance tests using an isoflow method, which allowed for measurements of maximum dynamic Pmus and Pdi, with controlled lung inflation. The subjects repeated maximum dynamic voluntary inspirations for 10 min. Pressures dropped exponentially from initial measurements at rest (Pmus(i) or Pdi(i)) to sustainable values (Pmus(s) or Pdi(s)). As flow and tidal volume increased, maximum initial and sustainable pressures decreased significantly. However, at a constant duty cycle, the sustainable dynamic pressures remained predictable fractions of initial dynamic pressures (i.e., Pmus(s)/Pmus(i) or Pdi(s)/Pdi(i)), regardless of changes in flow and tidal volume. In contrast, as duty cycle increased, the sustainable fractions significantly decreased for both Pdi and Pmus. For example, at a duty cycle of 0.29, Pmus(s)/Pmus(i) was ~0.71, and at a duty cycle of 0.57, Pmus(s)/Pmus(i) was ~0.62. Calculated sustainable pressure-time indexes varied significantly between 0.16 to 0.32 for Pmus and 0.11 to 0.22 for Pdi over the breathing patterns studied. We conclude that 1) the maximum dynamic pressure that can be sustained at a given duty cycle is a predictable fraction of the maximum dynamic pressure that can be generated at rest when measured under the same conditions of inspiration and 2) the sustainable fraction of initial dynamic pressure significantly decreases with increasing duty cycle.