MOVEMENT RULES FOR HERBIVORES IN SPATIALLY HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENTS - RESPONSES TO SMALL-SCALE PATTERN

被引:79
作者
GROSS, JE
ZANK, C
HOBBS, NT
SPALINGER, DE
机构
[1] Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, 80523, CO
[2] Mammals Research Section, Colorado Division of Wildlife, Ft. Collins, 80526, CO
[3] Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A and M University, Uvalde, 78801, TX
关键词
FORAGING; RANDOM WALK; SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY; SEARCH RULE;
D O I
10.1007/BF00129255
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Foraging herbivores respond to the spatial pattern of resources at a variety of scales. At small scales of space and time, existing models capture the essence of the feeding process and successfully predict intake rates. Models that operate over larger scales have not exhibited a similar success, in part because we have a limited understanding of the rules used by animals to make decisions in spatially complex environments, or of the consequences of departing from these rules. To evaluate the rules that large herbivores use when navigating between forages, we examined movements of bighorn sheep foraging on apparent prey (alfalfa plants) in hand-constructed patches of plants. Observations of movements and path lengths were compared to simulations that used a variety of different rules-of-thumb to determine a search path. Rules used in simulations ranged from a random walk with various detection distances, to more complicated rules that solved a variant of the travelling salesman problem. Simulations of a random walk yielded movement lengths that exceeded observations by a factor of 3 for long detection distances, and by 30-fold for short detection distances. Observed move distances were most closely approximated by simulations based on a nearest-neighbor rule - over 75% of all moves by bighorn sheep were to the closest available plant. Movement rules based on random walks are clearly inappropriate for many herbivores that typically consume visually apparent plants, and we suggest the use of a nearest-neighbor rule for modelling foraging by large herbivores.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 217
页数:9
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Altmann S.A., Baboons, space, time, and energy, Amer Zool, 14, pp. 221-248, (1974)
[2]  
Anderson D.J., Optimal foraging and the traveling salesman, Theor Pop Biol, 24, pp. 145-159, (1983)
[3]  
Bell W.J., Searching Behaviour, (1991)
[4]  
Belsky A.J., Role of small browsing mammals in preventing woodland regeneration in the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania, Afr J Ecol, 22, pp. 271-279, (1984)
[5]  
Crist T.O., Guertin D.S., Wiens J.A., Milne B.T., Animal movement in heterogeneous landscapes: an experiment with Eleodes beetles in shortgrass prairie, Functional Ecology, 6, pp. 536-544, (1992)
[6]  
Crist T.O., Wiens J.A., Scale effects of vegetation on forager movement and seed harvesting by ants, Oikos, 69, pp. 37-46, (1994)
[7]  
Detling J.K., Grasslands and savannas: regulation of energy flow and nutrient cycling by herbivores, Concepts of Ecosystem Ecology, pp. 131-148, (1988)
[8]  
Dodd J.L., Desertification and degradation in Sub-Saharan Africa, BioScience, 44, pp. 28-34, (1994)
[9]  
Dukas R., Ellner S., Information processing and prey detection, Ecology, 74, pp. 1337-1346, (1993)
[10]  
Ellison L., Influence of grazing on plant succession of rangelands, Bot Rev, 26, pp. 3-78, (1960)