SHOULD INDIRECT PURCHASERS HAVE STANDING TO SUE UNDER THE ANTITRUST-LAWS - ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS OF THE RULE OF ILLINOIS-BRICK

被引：48

作者：

LANDES, WM

POSNER, RA

机构：

来源：

关键词：

D O I：

10.2307/1599449

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：602 / 635

页数：34

相关论文

共 29 条

[1]

*ATLANTIC CITY ELE, 1964, GENERAL ELEC CO, VCASE

[2]

*BEACON FRUIT PROD, 1958, H HARRIS CO, VCASE

[3]

BECKER, 1974, J LEGAL STUD, V3, P1

[4]

BECKER G, 1971, EC THEORY, P142

[5]

*CLARK OIL CO, 1945, PHILLIPS PETROLEUM C, VCASE

[6]

DAM, 1975, J LEGAL STUD, V4, P56

[7]

DAM, 1975, J LEGAL STUD, V4, P47

[8]

*EDISON CO, 1964, ALLIS CHALMERS MFG C, VCASE

[9]

ELZINGA KG, 1976, ANTITRUST PENALTIES

[10]

*HANOVER SHOE CO, 1968, UNITED SHOE MACHINER, VCASE