Minority Entrepreneurship

被引:66
作者
Bates, Timothy [1 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
来源
FOUNDATIONS AND TRENDS IN ENTREPRENEURSHIP | 2011年 / 7卷 / 3-4期
关键词
D O I
10.1561/0300000036
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the field of minority entrepreneurship, sociologists and economists have written most of the influential studies, yet these groups typically ask different questions and base their analysis on different assumptions. The literature predictably lacks a single unifying focus and is quite diverse regarding issues explored and methodological approaches employed. Differing approaches and their outcomes are summarized and critically probed in this review. My intent is to illuminate strengths and weaknesses-along with patterns of common findings-in this voluminous literature. Minority-owned businesses are collectively reflections of evolving constraints and opportunities operating in broader society. Minorities seeking to create viable business ventures have traditionally faced higher barriers than whites as they sought to exploit market opportunities, raise financing, and penetrate mainstream networks. Entrepreneurial dynamics are clarified by focusing upon specific contexts in which firms are being shaped by prevailing opportunity structures. Progress has been noteworthy overall for minority-owned businesses, in part because barriers impeding their collective development have been gradually declining. The dominant methodological approaches and findings of economists and sociologists in the minority entrepreneurship literature are, ultimately, highly complementary. Sociologists have posed bolder questions while economists have paid more attention to pinning down causeand-effect relationships, yet their findings have been gradually moving towards convergence over the past two decades. It is possible - and desirable - that these respective bodies of work may someday merge, creating a minority entrepreneurship scholarly synthesis.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 311
页数:161
相关论文
共 171 条
[1]   ETHNIC RESIDENTIAL CONCENTRATION AND THE PROTECTED MARKET HYPOTHESIS [J].
ALDRICH, H ;
CATER, J ;
JONES, T ;
MCEVOY, D ;
VELLEMAN, P .
SOCIAL FORCES, 1985, 63 (04) :996-1009
[2]  
ALDRICH H, 1986, POPULATION PERSPECTI
[3]   The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory [J].
Alvarez, SA ;
Busenitz, LW .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2001, 27 (06) :755-775
[4]   Retail stores in poor urban neighborhoods [J].
Alwitt, LF ;
Donley, TD .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, 1997, 31 (01) :139-164
[5]   PRIMARY, SECONDARY, AND ENCLAVE LABOR-MARKETS - A TRAINING SYSTEMS-APPROACH [J].
BAILEY, T ;
WALDINGER, R .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1991, 56 (04) :432-445
[6]   Social capital as process: The meanings and problems of a theoretical metaphor [J].
Bankston, CL ;
Zhou, M .
SOCIOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 2002, 72 (02) :285-317
[8]   Financing the development of urban minority communities: Lessons of history [J].
Bates, T .
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY, 2000, 14 (03) :227-241
[9]   The urban development potential of black-owned businesses [J].
Bates, T .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2006, 72 (02) :227-237
[10]   Analysis of young, small firms that have closed: delineating successful from unsuccessful closures [J].
Bates, T .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2005, 20 (03) :343-358