A CIRCUMPLEX APPROACH TO THE 5 FACTOR MODEL - A FACET STRUCTURE OF TRAIT ADJECTIVES SUPPLEMENTED BY TRAIT VERBS

被引:20
作者
DERAAD, B
HOFSTEE, WKB
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0191-8869(93)90332-W
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The goal of this article is 2-fold. Firstly to show the utility of the circumplex principles in articulating trait structures, and secondly to show that the use of different word categories as trait descriptors can be exploited for the further refinement of the established Five Factor structure. We discuss simple structure and circumplex models and their integration, the so-called AB5C model. The AB5C model is applied to self-ratings (N = 200) on 551 personality adjectives and 507 personality verbs. The differences between the two data sets, adjective and verb data, are discussed, and the usefulness of both data sets for the mutual articulation of the respective wordclass specific trait structures is demonstrated.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 505
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
ANGLEITNER A, 1991, JUN INV WORKSH DEV S
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1947, DIMENSIONS PERSONALI
[3]   THE BIG 5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB-PERFORMANCE - A METAANALYSIS [J].
BARRICK, MR ;
MOUNT, MK .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 44 (01) :1-26
[4]   STRUCTURAL-ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL-BEHAVIOR [J].
BENJAMIN, LS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1974, 81 (05) :392-425
[5]   THE MULTIPLE CLASSIFICATION OF ACTS AND THE BIG 5 FACTORS OF PERSONALITY [J].
BORKENAU, P .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 1988, 22 (03) :337-352
[6]   ASSESSING THE 5-FACTOR MODEL OF PERSONALITY DESCRIPTION [J].
BRIGGS, SR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1992, 60 (02) :253-293
[7]   EVOLUTIONARY PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY [J].
BUSS, DM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 42 :459-491
[8]   The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters [J].
Cattell, RB .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1943, 38 (04) :476-506
[10]   4 WAYS 5 FACTORS ARE BASIC [J].
COSTA, PT ;
MCCRAE, RR .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1992, 13 (06) :653-665