ON THE COMPLEX ECONOMICS OF PATENT SCOPE

[1] ADELMAN, 1989, U PENN LAW REV, V137, P697

[2] ADELMAN, 1989, U PENN LAW REV, V137, P696

[3] THE DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS IN PATENT-LAW - QUESTIONS THAT PENNWALT DID NOT ANSWER [J]. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 1989, 137 (03) : 673 - 729

[4] AITKEN H, 1985, CONTINUOUS WAVE TECH, P195

[5] AITKEN H, 1976, SYNTONY SPARK ORIGIN, P203

[6] [Anonymous], COMMUNICATION

[7] ARENDT H, 1978, RISE FALL EC GROWTH

[8] Arrow K., 1962, RATE DIRECTION INVEN, DOI [10.1515/9781400879762-024, DOI 10.1515/9781400879762-024]

[9] OPTIMAL TIMING OF INNOVATIONS [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1968, 50 (03) : 348 - 355

[10] BECK, 1983, RES L EC, V5, P193

[1] ADELMAN, 1989, U PENN LAW REV, V137, P697

[2] ADELMAN, 1989, U PENN LAW REV, V137, P696

[3] THE DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS IN PATENT-LAW - QUESTIONS THAT PENNWALT DID NOT ANSWER [J]. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 1989, 137 (03) : 673 - 729

[4] AITKEN H, 1985, CONTINUOUS WAVE TECH, P195

[5] AITKEN H, 1976, SYNTONY SPARK ORIGIN, P203

[6] [Anonymous], COMMUNICATION

[7] ARENDT H, 1978, RISE FALL EC GROWTH

[8] Arrow K., 1962, RATE DIRECTION INVEN, DOI [10.1515/9781400879762-024, DOI 10.1515/9781400879762-024]

[9] OPTIMAL TIMING OF INNOVATIONS [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1968, 50 (03) : 348 - 355

[10] BECK, 1983, RES L EC, V5, P193