REPEATED-MEASURES IN RANDOMIZED BLOCK AND SPLIT-PLOT EXPERIMENTS

被引:63
作者
GUMPERTZ, ML
BROWNIE, C
机构
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE | 1993年 / 23卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1139/x93-083
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Randomized block and split-plot designs are among the most commonly used experimental designs in forest research. Measurements for plots in a block (or subplots in a whole plot) are correlated with each other, and these correlations must be taken into account when analyzing repeated-measures data from blocked designs. The analysis is similar to repeated-measures analysis for a completely randomized design, but test statistics must allow for random block x time effects, and standard errors for treatment means must also incorporate block to block variation and variation among plots within a block. Two types of statistical analysis are often recommended for repeated-measures data: analysis of contrasts of the repeated factor and multivariate analysis of variance. A complete analysis of repeated measures should usually contain both of these components, just as in univariate analysis of variance it is often necessary to decompose the main effects into single degree of freedom contrasts to answer the research objectives. We demonstrate the multivariate analysis of variance and the analysis of contrasts in detail for two experiments. In addition, estimation of coefficients assuming a polynomial growth curve is discussed in detail for one of these experiments. The first experiment, a randomized complete block design, is a forest nutrition study of the long-term effects of midrotation nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.); the second experiment, a split-plot design, is an air-pollution study of the effects of ozone and acid precipitation on loblolly pine growth.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 639
页数:15
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   UNIVARIATE VERSUS MULTIVARIATE TESTS IN REPEATED-MEASURES EXPERIMENTS [J].
DAVIDSON, ML .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1972, 77 (06) :446-&
[2]  
DRAPER NR, 1981, APPLIED REGRESSION A
[3]   GROWTH CURVE ANALYSIS OF TEMPERATURE-DEPENDENT PHENOLOGY MODELS [J].
ESKRIDGE, KM ;
STEVENS, EJ .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1987, 79 (02) :291-297
[4]  
GUMPERTZ ML, 1991, N C I STAT SER, V2202
[5]   STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS OF LINE-SOURCE SPRINKLER EXPERIMENTS AND OTHER NONRANDOMIZED EXPERIMENTS USING MULTIVARIATE METHODS [J].
JOHNSON, DE ;
CHAUDHURI, UN ;
KANEMASU, ET .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1983, 47 (02) :309-312
[6]  
Johnson R. A., 1988, APPL MULTIVARIATE ST, V2nd, P9607
[7]  
Kempthorne O., 1952, DESIGN ANAL EXPT
[8]  
KRESS LW, 1988, 81ST P AIR POLL CONT
[9]   NONLINEAR MIXED EFFECTS MODELS FOR REPEATED MEASURES DATA [J].
LINDSTROM, MJ ;
BATES, DM .
BIOMETRICS, 1990, 46 (03) :673-687
[10]   A UNIFIED APPROACH TO MIXED LINEAR-MODELS [J].
MCLEAN, RA ;
SANDERS, WL ;
STROUP, WW .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1991, 45 (01) :54-64