THE INFLUENCE OF STIMULUS TYPE ON THE MAGNETIC EXCITATION OF NERVE STRUCTURES

被引:70
作者
CLAUS, D [1 ]
MURRAY, NMF [1 ]
SPITZER, A [1 ]
FLUGEL, D [1 ]
机构
[1] NATL HOSP,LONDON WC1N 3BG,ENGLAND
来源
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1990年 / 75卷 / 04期
关键词
Central motor conduction; Magnetic induction; Magnetic nerve stimulation; Transcranial brain stimulation;
D O I
10.1016/0013-4694(90)90112-W
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The voltage measured was that induced in a measuring coil from 3 different commercially available magnetic stimulators. The strongest stimulus was from the Cadwell, followed by Novametrix and then Digitimer. The Digitimer and Novametrix produced a monophasic pulse, whilst the Cadwell stimulator produced a polyphasic pulse, all measured by an induction coil. This thought to be the reason why reversed coil polarity does not influence the position of peripheral nerve excitation with a Cadwell stimulator; this is, however, the case with the two other magnetic stimulators. Nevertheless, electrical stimulation was found to be the most useful method for exciting peripheral nerves. The lack of influence of Cadwell coil polarity on the excitation of spinal roots and motor cortex is also thought to be due to the bipolar stimulus effect mentioned above. The stimuli induced by Digitimer and Novametrix are monophasic, exciting onne hemisphere first, depending on the direction of the current impulse. The stimulus generated by Cadwell excites both hemispheres by reversal of current direction. © 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 349
页数:8
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] BARKER AT, 1985, LANCET, V1, P1106
  • [2] DIFFERENT SITES OF ACTION OF ELECTRICAL AND MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF THE HUMAN-BRAIN
    DAY, BL
    THOMPSON, PD
    DICK, JP
    NAKASHIMA, K
    MARSDEN, CD
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1987, 75 (01) : 101 - 106
  • [3] THE UTILITY OF MAGNETIC STIMULATION FOR ROUTINE PERIPHERAL-NERVE CONDUCTION STUDIES
    EVANS, BA
    LITCHY, WJ
    DAUBE, JR
    [J]. MUSCLE & NERVE, 1988, 11 (10) : 1074 - 1078
  • [4] RESPONSES IN SMALL HAND MUSCLES FROM MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF THE HUMAN-BRAIN
    HESS, CW
    MILLS, KR
    MURRAY, NMF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1987, 388 : 397 - 419
  • [5] AN ANALYSIS OF PERIPHERAL MOTOR-NERVE STIMULATION IN HUMANS USING THE MAGNETIC COIL
    MACCABEE, PJ
    AMASSIAN, VE
    CRACCO, RQ
    CADWELL, JA
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 70 (06): : 524 - 533
  • [6] MERTON PA, 1986, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V381, pP10
  • [7] MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION IN INTACT MAN .1. GENERAL-CHARACTERISTICS OF EMG RESPONSES IN DIFFERENT MUSCLES
    ROTHWELL, JC
    THOMPSON, PD
    DAY, BL
    DICK, JPR
    KACHI, T
    COWAN, JMA
    MARSDEN, CD
    [J]. BRAIN, 1987, 110 : 1173 - 1190