EFFECTS OF THE TYPE OF ADDITIVE AND THE TYPE OF SUPPLEMENT ON THE UTILIZATION OF GRASS-SILAGE FOR MILK-PRODUCTION IN DAIRY-COWS

Four silages were prepared from grass treated with additives designed to produce different extents of fermentation in the silo. The additive treatments were: formic acid at 5 l t-1; a bacterial inoculant (Ecosyl, ICI plc); the inoculant plus molasses at 20 kg t-1; and a no-additive control. All silages were well preserved. Formic acid severely restricted the extent of fermentation, the concentration of lactic acid being only 50% of that seen for the other treatments, all of which were similar in lactic acid concentrations. The silages were offered ad libitum either as the sole component of the diet or together with three supplement treatments to 16 British Friesian cows, in four 4 treatment x 4 period Latin squares with periods of 28 d duration. The supplements were: a barley-based mixture at 5 kg d-1 (B); a high-fat, high-protein product at 2 kg d-1 (FP1) and at 3 kg d-1 (FP2); both FP treatments were given with 1 kg d-1 of molassed sugarbeet pulp. A preliminary experiment, using three lactating, rumen-cannulated cows in a 3 x 3 Latin square design with 28-d periods, provided information on rumen digestion when the supplements were given with a separate, non-experimental silage. In the preliminary experiment, neither of the FP treatments influenced the molar proportion of the major rumen volatile fatty acids compared with treatment B; nor were there any depressive effects of the FP treatments on silage intake compared with treatment B. In the main experiment, the intake of silage with the inoculant treatment was less than that with the other treatments, the effect being generally significant (at least P<0.05) for all three supplements. When the silages were given unsupplemented, there were differences in the concentration (P<0.001) and yield (P<0.01) of milk fat, both of which were lowest for the no-additive control and highest for the formic acid silage. When supplement B was given, the concentration and yield of milk fat were lowest for the no-additive control and the concentration and yield of milk protein were highest for the formic acid silage. For all silages both FP treatments tended to depress silage intake and reduce the concentration of fat and protein in milk compared with treatment B. Although there were clear indications of differences in nutritional characteristics between the silages, there was little evidence that the differences between silages influenced the responses to changes in the composition of the supplements.