ODORANT-SPECIFIC SPATIAL PATTERNS IN MUCOSAL ACTIVITY PREDICT PERCEPTUAL DIFFERENCES AMONG ODORANTS

被引:32
作者
KENT, PF
YOUNGENTOB, SL
SHEEHE, PR
机构
[1] SUNY HLTH SCI CTR, CLIN OLFACTORY RES CTR, DEPT PHYSIOL, SYRACUSE, NY 13210 USA
[2] SUNY HLTH SCI CTR, CLIN OLFACTORY RES CTR, DEPT NEUROL, SYRACUSE, NY 13210 USA
[3] SUNY HLTH SCI CTR, CLIN OLFACTORY RES CTR, DEPT PREVENT MED, SYRACUSE, NY 13210 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1152/jn.1995.74.4.1777
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
1. Using operant techniques, rats were trained to differentially report (i.e., identify) the odorants propanol, carvone, citral, propyl acetate, and ethylacetoacetate. After acquisition training, the animals were tested using a 5 x 5 confusion matrix design. The results of the behavioral tests were used to measure the degree of perceptual dissimilarity between any pair of odorants. These dissimilarity measures were then subjected to multidimensional scaling analysis to establish a two-dimensional perceptual odor space for each rat. 2. At the completion of behavioral testing, the fluorescence changes in the dye di-4-ANEPPS were monitored on the rat's nasal septum and medial surface of the turbinates in response to the same odorants. For each mucosal surface a 6.0 x 6.0 mm area was sampled at 100 contiguous sites with a 10 x 10 photodiode array. 3. Formal statistical analysis indicated a highly significant predictive relationship between the relative position of an odorant's mucosal loci of maximal activity or ''hot spot'' and the relative position of the same odorant in a psychophysically determined perceptual odor space (F = 15.6, P < 0.001). 4. The results of this study suggest for the first time that odorant-induced mucosal activity patterns serve as the substrate for the perception of odorant quality.
引用
收藏
页码:1777 / 1781
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Adrian ED, 1951, ANN PSYCHOL, V50, P107
[2]   SENSORY DISCRIMINATION - WITH SOME RECENT EVIDENCE FROM THE OLFACTORY ORGAN [J].
ADRIAN, ED .
BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 1950, 6 (04) :330-332
[3]  
ATTNEAVE F, 1959, APPLICATIONS INFORMA
[4]   RESPONSES OF OLFACTORY BULB NEURONS TO ODOR STIMULATION OF SMALL NASAL AREAS IN SALAMANDER [J].
KAUER, JS ;
MOULTON, DG .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1974, 243 (03) :717-+
[5]   THE RECORDING OF ODORANT-INDUCED MUCOSAL ACTIVITY PATTERNS WITH A VOLTAGE-SENSITIVE DYE [J].
KENT, PF ;
MOZELL, MM .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 68 (05) :1804-1819
[6]   MULTIDIMENSIONAL-SCALING BY OPTIMIZING GOODNESS OF FIT TO A NONMETRIC HYPOTHESIS [J].
KRUSKAL, JB .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1964, 29 (01) :1-27
[7]  
KUBIE JL, 1980, OLFACTION TASTE, V7, P163
[8]   TOPOGRAPHIC CODING OF ODORANT QUALITY IS MAINTAINED AT DIFFERENT CONCENTRATIONS IN THE SALAMANDER OLFACTORY EPITHELIUM [J].
MACKAYSIM, A ;
SHAMAN, P .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1984, 297 (02) :207-216
[9]   TOPOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF RESPONSIVENESS TO ODORANTS IN THE RAT OLFACTORY EPITHELIUM [J].
MACKAYSIM, A ;
KESTEVEN, S .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 71 (01) :150-160
[10]   TOPOGRAPHIC CODING OF OLFACTORY QUALITY - ODORANT-SPECIFIC PATTERNS OF EPITHELIAL RESPONSIVITY IN THE SALAMANDER [J].
MACKAYSIM, A ;
SHAMAN, P ;
MOULTON, DG .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1982, 48 (02) :584-596