COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS OF ENTITLEMENT PROBLEMS - A CRITIQUE

[1] ACKERMAN, 1971, YALE LAW J, V80, P1093

[2] AMES, 1908, HARV L REV, V22, P111

[3] AMES, 1908, HARVARD LAW REV, V22, P97

[4] BAKER, 1975, PHIL PUB AFF, V5, P13

[5] BAKER, 1978, UCLA LAW REV, V25, P381

[6] BAKER, 1975, PHIL PUB AFF, V5, P1

[7] BATOR, 1957, AM EC REV, V47, P22

[8] BAUMOL W, 1965, WELFARE EC THEORY ST, P64

[9] BEBCHUK, 1980, HOFSTRA L REV, V8, P671

[10] BLACKSTONE W, COMMENTARIES, V3

[1] ACKERMAN, 1971, YALE LAW J, V80, P1093

[2] AMES, 1908, HARV L REV, V22, P111

[3] AMES, 1908, HARVARD LAW REV, V22, P97

[4] BAKER, 1975, PHIL PUB AFF, V5, P13

[5] BAKER, 1978, UCLA LAW REV, V25, P381

[6] BAKER, 1975, PHIL PUB AFF, V5, P1

[7] BATOR, 1957, AM EC REV, V47, P22

[8] BAUMOL W, 1965, WELFARE EC THEORY ST, P64

[9] BEBCHUK, 1980, HOFSTRA L REV, V8, P671

[10] BLACKSTONE W, COMMENTARIES, V3