Selection among open population capture-recapture models when capture probabilities are heterogeneous

被引:37
作者
Burnham, KP
Anderson, DR
White, GC
机构
[1] COLORADO STATE UNIV,NATL BIOL SERV,COLORADO COOPERAT FISH & WILDLIFE RES UNIT,FT COLLINS,CO 80523
[2] COLORADO STATE UNIV,DEPT FISHERY & WILDLIFE BIOL,FT COLLINS,CO 80523
关键词
D O I
10.1080/02664769524496
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Selection of a parsimonious model as a basis for statistical inference from capture-recapture data is critical, especially when using open models in the analysis of multiple, interrelated data sets (e.g males and females, with two to three age classes, over three to five areas and 10-15 years). The global (i.e. most general) model for such data sets might contain hundreds of survival and recapture parameters. Here, we focus on a series of nested models of the Cormack-Jolly-Seber type wherein the likelihood arises from products of multinomial distributions whose cell probabilities are reparameterized in terms of survival (phi) and mean capture ((p) over bar) probabilities. This paper presents numerical results on two information-theoretic methods for model selection when the capture probabilities are heterogeneous over individual animals: Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) and a dimension-consistent criterion (CAIC), derived fr om a Bayesian viewpoint. Quality of model selection was evaluated based on the relative Euclidian distance between standardized <(theta)over cap> and theta (parameter theta is vector-valued and contains the survival (phi) and mean capture ((p) over bar) probabilities); this quantity (RSS = Sigma[(<(theta)over cap>(i) - theta(i))/theta(i)](2)) is a sum of squared bias and variance. Thus, the quality of inference (RSS) was judged by comparing the performance of the two information criteria and the use of the true model (used to generate the data), in relation to the model that provided the smallest RSS We found that heterogeneity in the capture probabilities had a negligible effect on model selection using AIC or CAIC. Model size increased as sample size increased with both AIC- and CAIC-selected models.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 624
页数:14
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   LIKELIHOOD OF A MODEL AND INFORMATION CRITERIA [J].
AKAIKE, H .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1981, 16 (01) :3-14
[2]  
AKAIKE H, 1994, 1ST P US JAP C FRONT, V3, P27
[3]  
Akaike H., 1992, 2 INT S INF THEOR, P267, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15
[4]  
Akaike H., 1985, CELEBRATION STAT, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4613-8560-8_1
[5]   AIC MODEL SELECTION IN OVERDISPERSED CAPTURE-RECAPTURE DATA [J].
ANDERSON, DR ;
BURNHAM, KP ;
WHITE, GC .
ECOLOGY, 1994, 75 (06) :1780-1793
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1989, FROM DATA TO MODEL
[8]  
Burnham K. P., 1987, AM FISHERIES SOC MON, V5
[9]   EVALUATION OF THE KULLBACK-LEIBLER DISCREPANCY FOR MODEL SELECTION IN OPEN POPULATION CAPTURE-RECAPTURE MODELS [J].
BURNHAM, KP ;
ANDERSON, DR ;
WHITE, GC .
BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 36 (03) :299-315
[10]   MODEL SELECTION STRATEGY IN THE ANALYSIS OF CAPTURE-RECAPTURE DATA [J].
BURNHAM, KP ;
WHITE, GC ;
ANDERSON, DR .
BIOMETRICS, 1995, 51 (03) :888-898