GENERALIZATION AND DISCRIMINATION OF SHAPE ORIENTATION IN PIGEON

Pigeons learned to peck a green key on which parallelogram‐shapes were projected; they then received generalization tests in which the orientation of the parallelogram was varied. Nondifferential training produced very little eventual stimulus control along the orientation dimension, but when training included S– trials (absence of the parallelogram) subjects responded consistently more to certain orientations than to others. Unlike typical results for visual generalization (e.g., line‐tilt), the tilt gradients obtained for this complex stimulus were bimodal, supporting predictions on the basis of human perceptual data. However, unimodal gradients could be produced by specific discrimination training along the orientation dimension. Other forms of intradimensional training also produced relatively steep gradients, often characterized by unexpected but consistent secondary peaks. An attempt to obtain inhibitory gradients (S+: green key; S–: parallelogram on a green background) resulted in virtually zero responding all along the shape‐orientation dimension; therefore, specific inhibitory control could not be evaluated. All these experiments suggest that definition of this complex stimulus dimension in terms of mere “angular orientation” is inappropriate, and alternative interpretations are discussed. 1968 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior