RELATIVE GROWTH-RATES AND PLANT ALLOCATION PATTERNS

[1] THE MINERAL-NUTRITION OF WILD PLANTS [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1980, 11 : 233 - 260

[2] Chapin III F S, 1985, PHYSL ECOLOGY N AM P, P16, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-4830-3_2

[3] Field C., 1986, EC PLANT FORM FUNCTI, P25

[4] Gleason H.A., 1963, MANUAL VASCULAR PLAN

[5] HUCHINSON GE, 1975, LIMNOLOGICAL BOTANY

[6] ITLMAN D, 1988, PLANT STRATEGIES DYN

[7] OECHEL WC, 1985, PHYSL ECOLOGY N AM P, P66, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-4830-3_4

[8] LEAF-AREA RATIO AND NET ASSIMILATION RATE OF 24 WILD-SPECIES DIFFERING IN RELATIVE GROWTH-RATE [J]. OECOLOGIA, 1990, 83 (04) : 553 - 559

[9] IS INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION IN RELATIVE GROWTH-RATE POSITIVELY CORRELATED WITH BIOMASS ALLOCATION TO THE LEAVES [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1991, 138 (05) : 1264 - 1268

[10] Poorter H., 1989, CAUSES CONSEQUENCES, P45

[1] THE MINERAL-NUTRITION OF WILD PLANTS [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1980, 11 : 233 - 260

[2] Chapin III F S, 1985, PHYSL ECOLOGY N AM P, P16, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-4830-3_2

[3] Field C., 1986, EC PLANT FORM FUNCTI, P25

[4] Gleason H.A., 1963, MANUAL VASCULAR PLAN

[5] HUCHINSON GE, 1975, LIMNOLOGICAL BOTANY

[6] ITLMAN D, 1988, PLANT STRATEGIES DYN

[7] OECHEL WC, 1985, PHYSL ECOLOGY N AM P, P66, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-4830-3_4

[8] LEAF-AREA RATIO AND NET ASSIMILATION RATE OF 24 WILD-SPECIES DIFFERING IN RELATIVE GROWTH-RATE [J]. OECOLOGIA, 1990, 83 (04) : 553 - 559

[9] IS INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION IN RELATIVE GROWTH-RATE POSITIVELY CORRELATED WITH BIOMASS ALLOCATION TO THE LEAVES [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1991, 138 (05) : 1264 - 1268

[10] Poorter H., 1989, CAUSES CONSEQUENCES, P45